Search results

My faith in Jesus does not stand in the wisdom of men [church-ianity] , but rather in the power [authority/strength] of God. 1 Cor. 2:5 Those who are of Church-ianity are quite the opposite. They have a form of godliness but deny the power [authority/strength] thereof. 2 Tim. 3:5. "All of the...

I see that you also don't understand or comprehend all of 1 Cor. ch. 2, but for the sake of it, you would much rather think along the lines of the wisdom of men and not that which the Holy Spirit teaches, which is comparing spiritual things with spiritual. Did you forget how Matthias was...

My point, in spite of what men think, is that God did not choose Matthias, but rather men did, through "the game of chance". Peter never waited to think that God may have had a selection of His own. Because Peter was pushing his agenda to fulfill a prophecy in the book of Psalms, Matthias is...

I'm assuming that you are making a play on words. OK.....but....why do you want to neutralize or negate such a prophetic statement and it's outcome? Could it be the future scenario of Rev. 9:13-22, or 2 Thes. 1:7-10, as Luke 17:28-30 also describes it?

1 Thes. 5 [3] For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. https://www.bitchute.com/video/cQp3mCpfLCCq

I don't think that you are grasping the enormity of what I am talking about. The life of Matthias is "a drop in the bucket" of importance, in comparison to understanding the reality of Jesus' 70th week of 7 years. In time, it truthfully HAS BEEN fully manifested in its calculation of (3.5...

You didn't answer the question. "Where does the scriptures say that Matthias was chosen by Jesus as were the others?? It doesn't. However, Paul was chosen personally by Jesus." This is not a tricky question, nor do I have a problem with it. In fact, it's quite common among born again Christians...

I never said that Matthias was not considered to be one of the twelve according to men. What I am saying is that Matthias was never chosen by Jesus, BUT Paul was, which was TO PROVE that Jesus Himself WAS INDEED confirming the covenant AFTER His resurrection by His Holy Spirit for the latter...

Oh, did you mean the verse that you "negated" from my post, by neglecting to include it in your copy of my post? Since you did not reference it, I will do that here: Rom. 10[12] For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.

Where does the scriptures say that Matthias was chosen by Jesus as were the others?? It doesn't. However, Paul was chosen personally by Jesus. As a result, you have no grounds to accuse me of anything.

Ever since Jesus died and resurrected, God has a serious surprise for you and all: Rom. 10 [11] For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. [12] For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him...

What?? You never heard the prophetic scriptures taught according to the Amillennial view? Are you saying that you have NO interpretation of the scriptures by the Holy Spirit (the mind of Christ) within you? That is to say that you do have interpretations, but only by what is literally written...

Peter made his choice to replace Judas for God BEFORE he received the Holy Spirit. You have a literal problem of being only a literalist. See 1 Cor. 2:9-16 [12] Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given...

Concerning the 70 week prophecy and the 70th week, many Christians are being duped and misled in their understanding of KJV Dan. 9:24-27. It's not due to misreading the book of Daniel, but rather intentionally misinterpreting it for the sake of holding to an extremely false doctrine, called...

According to the religions of church-ianity, Matthias is "their" man. But as to Jesus' choice for Judas' replacement, it most definitely was Paul. My point was that BEFORE Pentecost, Peter took it upon himself to inform God through the game of a 50/50 Raffle of who the replacement for Judas...

And that discernment is by "the wisdom of men".

In literal words no, but in the beginning of His ministy, He implied the New covenant by His parable of the old wine and the New wine in Mark 2:22; and by the miracle He performed at the marriage in John 2:1-10. Dan. 9:27 is referencing the Six works of God in 9:24. Those six works were...

The last work of the Lord Jesus towards the disciples, was to replace Judas Iscarriot. And that He did by choosing and selecting Saul (Paul) while traveling on the road to Damascus, approx. 33-40AD. Acts 9:1-6. On the other hand, just before Pentecost, Matthias was a "50/50 raffle", rigged by...

Have it the way you want, but verse 27 fully explains WHICH "HE" is confirming the covenant. KJV Dan. 9[27] And HE [Jesus] shall confirm the [New] covenant with many for one week [3.5+3.5=7.0 yrs.]: and in the midst of the week HE [Jesus- by the sacrifice of himself] shall cause the [Temple]...

The Lord's Truth is stranger than the fiction of "the wisdom of men"- Earburner. Who told you that it is OK to take the 70th week of Jesus and move that period of time of 7 years into the far future of our day? Have you, and the Bible colleges become God Almighty, thinking that you/they can...