Search results

Well the bible does give us the answers. If one is saved they cannot perish as jesus declared. If one appeared saved but go to teh lake of fire, 3 places in Scripture say they never were saved to egin with. Matt. 7:21-23 Matt. 13:24-30 (parable form) 1 John 2:19

Well we m ust remember that the OT was originally written in Hebrew. The LXX is a translation! And I do not buy the chronologies of Egypt and Sumerian or any other secular set. Many have been shown to be altered by the civilizations themselves for their own glory. I fully trust Scripture...

Well it is another good news that is being preached on earth. It is not the gospel of salvation, but the everlasting good news that says "fear God and give Him glory!

Sorry but Baptism has not replaced circumcision. No I showed you Jewish historians. I can also bring secular historical works that show the same truth. But as you reject history, have the last word, we have reached the end of this converstaion being useful.

Well I have overlooked somehow the 1 Chron. and Tobit reference. I would be grateful if you reposted them. It doesn't matter how much the LXX influenced NT thought. From Catholic Answers: In the New Testament, the Greek word "adelphos" (plural: "adelphoi") primarily means "brother" or...

There is a difference between needing and doing. Jesus as the head of the estate had the sole authority to pass on teh care of His mom to whoever. Well you do make it an appeal to authority outside of Scripture. And you haven't yet addressed the incongruity of Mt. 12: Matthew 12:46-50 King...

Well I will see your scholar and raise you three. In Koine Greek, the present active indicative verb form indicates that the action is ongoing and is performed by the subject. It shows that the action occurs in the present time and is a true statement. The verb can change in person and number...

Right as I showed you from the decree of a pope! Unless of course the Vicar of Christ was wrong!!!!!!! This is right out of a Roman Catholic Encyclopedia: In the Roman Catholic Church an anathema is not merely a symbolic protest. Here is the definition of “anathema” from the Catholic...

No, it is very much the point. Yes in the OT brother was used more broadly trhan in the New as I have showed you from the varied experet Koine Greek NT sources. One has to be careful going from old to new for there are nuances when transliterating, as I showed you in teh two examples provided...

According to you I do, but according to teh experts, I do not. Now you are twisting the truth. I never implied I was a greek expert. I do know how to navigate through the experts though. Your argument is moot considering your Romanist church puts the comma in the same place. Yes Greek had no...

And you are overlooking the fact that John had no home of his own. He was a teen when He was called to be with Jesus. Did not have a home to take her to and was an Apostle so he was a road warrior. And we have no record of Hom having a wife either. So it makes it very hard for John to be the...

Nope! I simply used Greek dictionaries, Lexicons and linguistic study guides to show me. Once again if jesus brothers are cousins then this is how this passage would read: Mt. 12: 46 While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with...

And I can get my experts that show him wrong! Appeal to authority is a very subjective thing. Wrong again. What I wrote is the real exegesis and hermeneutic for that verse. The present tense includes past action if modified like Mary did . Once again if Mary was proclaiming hersel fto stay...

Sorry, but that is not what history says. The bar or Bat mitzvah entered a child into the "household". Once again from Paul: Galatians 4 King James Version 4 Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; 2 But is under tutors...

How wrong you are again! But you forget that Jesus came to baptize people with the Holy Spirit, not in water! Even 1 peter shows you wrong! For the Baptism that saves is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, the moment one places their trust in teh death and resurrection of Jesus as the full...

Well based on the accounts of SCripture and the usage of the word "household" in reference to being baptized, I would suspect it is someone 12 or older. Babies cannot be baptized for they know not what they are doing. Doctrine by silence is a dangerous thing. All baptisms reported were by...

It is not for people of any age. One has to know what salvation is and have been saved in order to move to Baptism. There is no record of infants being baptized. Ass for Cornelius and the Philippian jailer when it speaks of their household? In that culture and time, a member of the household...

_Please do not break your arm, patting yourself on your back! So now the whole argument lies in the fact I mentioned 2nd heaven as a probability. See I fully believe it is in our atmosphere, but I give the leeway simply because there are clouds in the 2nd heaven or space. The rapture is...

Baptism is for one who already had their sins forgiven and been born of th eSpirit. Paul made that abundantly clear! FYI ask a Jew when the modern diaspora started and they will tell you 70-135 AD. Rome can't change history When Jews speak of the diapsora they speak of the 70-135 AD event...

Let me see, should I take the word of a hard line indoctrinated Roman Catholic or the word of a born again Jew who by the age of thirteen had the penteteuch, and the Poetic books memorized in order? And also was the son of a Jewish rebbe, patriarch of rabbis? And who has studied Jewish culture...