Search results

There was nothing to elaborate on. It was an apples to clipper ships comparison.

no

As always, you are wrong. There is no "untruth" there- only an error of translation born of either lazy, improper or agenda driven read. Which one is yours?

Nothing related to the animal proper but in context through cultural eyes over there- a great deal

You obviously have no knowledge whatsoever of the cultures those languages come from or you wouldn't have made such an idiotic statement in context to this discussion. Either that or you are deliberately proffering a point you know to be false. Which one is it?

deceptiveness based on the hissing and slithering

so do I

Specific to the individual, I seriously doubt it Specific to what he is up to and why, many times We are not ignorant of his schemes. He is not here to build or to learn or to grow

What verse says the opposite of that? More specifically, what verse says we subjugate ourselves to the RCC?

Yes and also ponder that they have 2 different meanings and applications- neither are direct and linear

Again, another error on your part. The term translated to "serpent" is a metaphor based on an "attribute" of a serpent- it is NOT ( and never has been) the proper noun for "snake" (talking or otherwise) Those trees are not made of "lumber' either.

a no name fighter just there to be the punching bag

Actually no. The office of HP was of the Levites as they were the only ones who could go into the "holy of Holies" in the presence of God. There were many. Jesus was the "last" as from Him forward "we" could access God with no more intermediaries

Point out the "untruths". What you "think" really has no weight in anything anywhere. I have already studied and decided.

Let me help you with this- maybe clear up some mud Some of this has to do with 'weak" English translations of the words church/temple etc and their use in scripture. The word Ekklesistia has multiple meanings depending on placement and tense in a passage to include an individual person...

Scripture (as originally penned) is both true and correct. The specific subject will determine the application of the meaning and to what degree. It does not require "interpretation" as much as it requires proper translation, application and proper vetting techniques. Context is a part of that...

That's a patently absurd thought and Darwin did no such of a thing. Man hasn't improved in any way- he just builds better toys. And no, I do NOT believe in talking serpents ( defined as snakes)

You do understand that salvation and reward are two totally different and decoupled things don't you?

There is no "shift". Man has been fallen since the first sin and anything else is just a degree of deviation

Definitely a smart move on your part and totally expected.