Search results

That's because you have yet to define a specific point of error. I commented earlier on the aggregate of some of your postings. Again, pick a specific point that you believe is in error and post your evidence to back it up and I'll correct it and you accordingly. That's simple enough isn't it?

There is no private interpretation of scripture. We either have the correct understanding or we don't. The act of legitimate discourse ( arguing even up to a heated one) is a part of the process. It doesn't become "wrong" until people refuse to acknowledge a truth because it doesn't fit their...

You are not the first person to use humor as a shield to hide inadequacies and you wont be the last. What you wont do is refute the essence of anything I say with legitimate scripture and honestly, nothing beyond that matters.

There is the OT scriptures about men wearing women's clothes but don't specifically remember. Here's the thing that a lot of people use as arguing points for a variety of motives (none righteous for the cause of Scripture) Scripture clearly and unmistakably defines both sex and gender in roles...

No and no matter how many times you wish that were the case, it never will be.

Personally I think it closer to a den of thieves, nest of vipers or maybe a Temple of Baal.

No, in truth and reality.

All out of context and in error. Probably because you have too many humans of questionable intelligence and motives between the man and the CEO so much error creeps in. Even still, you have yet to "correct" any of those points I made because legitimate doctrine overrides dogma 100% of the time...

Ye shall know them by their fruits.

In reality, "sin" is not defined by what we "believe" or want to be so and there is no such thing as "righting" a wrong any more than there is changing lead to gold. The "wrong" must be removed and "right" put in its place. Nowhere is it said or implied that the Lord is going to "negotiate" a...

That's really an argument of semantics as there is no such thing as a "non genuine" legitimate "anything". If then its a non genuine article then call it a clone, copy, forgery, Xerox or whatever but its not the original or "certified true copy". There are many groups and denominations out...

Jones, make sure you disregard everything in #13 as the bulk of it is flat out incorrect by a correct read of scripture. Again, "baptism" simply means immersion/saturation- it has to have a qualifier to define the meaning in context. "water baptism" is a man made public ceremony ( recommended...

I am as well and this is no attempt to judge you in any way. The way you present your thoughts however does make it difficult to discern the base thoughts though in order to really go deep into a specific subject

run Forrest run. I suppose any excuse to protect such weak arguments will do when its all you have. They even have a Proverb on that (28:1 to be exact) The wicked flee when no man pursueth, but the righteous are bold as a lion. So run along and hide

If there was no prohibition then the act would have not been considered a sin and punished That is incumbent on the one giving the standard. Is there a specific example you would use? Very welcome but correct is not 'subjective" and what you have been given is scriptural "correct"

That answered everything and "cult" status of the RCC is debatable at best. I recognize the dogma and error you spout and probably know as much or more about your own false premise as you do. I also see that arrogance born of a feeling of superiority which is also false in reality. Instead of...

There is no such thing as a "holy church". A "church" is a body of believers. The "church" has no authority or power as an entity.

Sin was in the world long before the Law was given and no God didn't "create'' sin by creating the law. It is also written that if there is no law covering, then there is no violation of the law but that can still be sin ( falling short) I believe you, thats why i was assisting you in doing...

I am making perfect sense and you know that- you are just deliberately waffling and spinning in a circle. Go to post 8 and read your own words then the inquiry and then address it in context.

what do you base this on if I may? This is not only counter to all themes of scripture but would actually mean God "created" sin and these people would not be accountable for their sins and that simply is impossible.