Search results

Not seeing the relevance to this topic. It’s something you can Google.

If he is Catholic that makes sense he is against the KJB. Here is one of the Catholic books. Notice which version they don’t want you to read.

Not true. Man shall not live by bread alone but by every word of God. Matthew 4:4 is not talking about multiple versions of Jesus.

https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/young-earth/young-earth-creationist-view-summarized-and-defended/ https://www.christianforums.com/threads/what-does-scripture-mean-about-perfection.8019199/...

There is a symbiotic relationship between the Living Word (Jesus) and the Communicated Word (the Scriptures or the Holy Bible). Here are 41 verses: https://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-living-word-the-communicated-word.8157028/ So if it took approximately 4,000 years for the Word to be...

It really is not a true answer to solving the problem. How do you know you have correct doctrines without a perfect Bible? Your response would be like saying the answer to 2 + 2 = 5. It’s a response but it is not a true answer or solution. Your response is illogical and an evasion of the...

First, you didn’t answer my question. Second, I cannot force you to see the truth and I imagine it is just as silly in your mind to believe God has preserved His Word today in a 1600’s English Bible. I imagine you think it is preposterous. But think. How many people today do you think the...

If you don’t have a perfect Bible then how do you know you have the correct doctrines? Modern Translations actually change doctrine for the worse and not for the better.

To all: John says to ”sin not.” (1 John 2:1). Jesus says to ”sin no more” (John 5:14) (John 8:11). It’s not possible to ”sin NOT” or “sin NO MORE” as instructed in God’s Word if the Bible did not teach such truths. Sure, there is grace if one stumbles (Psalms 51), and or even struggles with...

To all: Dear Believer of God’s Word: This derailed argument on this topic of which Bible we should use started because the OP (Johann) favors an original languages interpretation over what the English says in the Bible when it comes to 1 Peter 4:1-2, 2 Corinthians 7:1, and Galatians 5:24...

@RLT63 The NKJV is a bridge Bible to the Modern Translations and Textual Criticism. The NKJV will point to the Nestle and Aland text (NU) and or say this verse is not in the NU, etc. This just shoots one believing God’s Word to begin with because of all the footnotes that make you doubt God’s...

It does not matter. If one does not have a perfect Bible then THEY become the final authority and not the Bible. Every word of God is pure. I believe Psalms 12:6-7 and Proverbs 30:5. Most today do not believe such verses.

I explained one supposed KJB contradiction that you seen as a problem and this just shows that folks are seeing error or contradiction where none exists. You also are not dealing with the problems in the New King James (compared to the KJB). I am not going to keep explaining things that you...

The Catholics really don't know that they are favoring wrong manuscripts that attacks the Trinity. They do not have the spiritual discernment to see that they are holding to the wrong Alexandrian manuscripts. The Catholics want you to believe in trusting in the priests to understand the...

If the NKJV has so much authority that the editors of the ©1982 NKJV actually encourage their readers to alter it as they see fit. You don’t believe it? Here’s what they said: Source: https://av1611.com/kjbp/articles/mcelroy-nkjv.html Also, which New King James Version is your base? Not all...

Again, you’re not getting what I am saying. The Catholics did not take out 1 John 5:7. The gnostics (Arians from Alexandria) had taken out 1 John 5:7, but the Catholics favored these manuscripts not because it did not teach the Trinity but because they want you to believe the Trinity based on...

You lost me. I have no idea what your talking about. You have to be more specific by quoting my actual words from a certain post #, and then go from there.

I am not sure you understand me here. First, the Catholics are only going by the Alexandrian manuscripts. The United Bible Societies (Protestant) and the Vatican worked on the Nestle and Aland Text. Most of all your Modern bibles are based off the Nestle and Aland NT Greek text. Second, do...

@RLT63 Please briefly summarize your position on your approach to the Bible. If you want me to summarize anything, I will be happy to help.