Search results

She won't burn in hell. She may have other children that she needs to think about. Should her other children be motherless when her death could have been prevented?

See, your words right betray you. You think they should die instead of having an abortion that would save their lives.

Your own words betray you. I have not lied about you at all.

Yes, there are instances where the fetus is killing her and she has to make the choice tonsave her life or die with the fetus. I have told no lies about you and have quoted what you said in a reply above. So do not try to say that you haven't.

I am a Christian, and yes, Christians do. So you do advocate that women die along with the fetus when the fetus us killing her.

All this I agree with!

You are seriously removed from reality! You are advocating that women die when they have a pregnancy that is going to kill them. Don't deny that this what you want as your posts reveal that very thing. It doesn't matter to you that by having an abortion it will save one life, as long as she...

Your opinion is noted! I see you won't answer my questions. That's very telling.

If the fetus was going to die anyway, why should both die? If the fetus is killing the mother and the mother dies, the fetus dies too. Why should both die, when the mother can live? A Christian would make that choice, especially if that Christian is already a mother and has other children to...

If the fetus was killing me and it is a choice between me dying or both dying, if I was a woman I would have an abortion. Why should both die when one can live?

Not all abortions are birth control, and I have said repeatedly that I am against abortion for birth control purposes. Christian mothers would have an abortion to save their life when there is no viability for the fetus. Why should both die?

It is not propaganda and does happen. Just because you don't think that it happens doesn't make it propaganda. I gave you several reasons for medical abortions to save the life of the mother. It wasn't propaganda, but real-life conditions that can happen during pregnancies.

So, you think they should both die then? That is what you are saying?

Nope, if the pregnancy is killing the mother, they both die. Do you not understand that?

You're opinion of course. So it is your opinion that both should die?

I am a Christian and support abortions when the life of the mother is at risk. I am defending medical abortions, not the abortion industry. There is a difference. Still avoiding my questions.

Hospitals get paid to save the life of the mother when the pregnancy will kill them if it were to continue. Are you against saving the life of the mother? Why are you avoiding my question?

Which doesn't have anything to do with what you quoted. Hospitals perform abortions for medical reasons generally as that is where they are discovered to where the mother is transported to. I know this because I have done those transports from a doctor's office.

I am a Christian and support medical abortions as do millions of other Christians who realize that instead of two deaths there need only be one. You are still avoiding my question. So you're saying that no women need an abortion to save their lives?

I'm not playing at anything. I support abortions for medical reasons, not for birth control. There is a difference. Also, when it is a medical abortion, they are done within a hospital. Planned parenthood gets nothing from it.