Search results

and you have no functional knowledge of philology or other related fields as they apply to the subject at hand

It doesn't work that way except in the science fiction genre. For something to be a "law" of physics, it must be proven by falsification ( or it is reduced to a theory, axiom etc.) Therefor, any "law" we have yet to discover cannot contradict anything we have already proven. "They" don't have...

Then you need to read scripture and understand it. Angels can be solid or physical, and mate with humans and produce offspring to name a few. They can also assume forms of people. As far as the linear time it takes them to do something- nowhere in scripture is that addressed so its a baseless...

I said transliteration- I meant transliteration You are attaching an "English words" to a non English word that has no direct equivalency in language meaning. That's only the start of your misunderstandings but a major component.

Just as an aside comment from having dealt with a few of these over the years, let me offer you some commentary from someone with a somewhat extensive information in some of the related fields. As far as life ( defined as some form of 'flesh" be it human, Vulcan, Klingon, Grey or Reptilian)...

I could write a thesis on false LDS doctrine but it would be a painful read so I just hit the high points for ease of readability.

I might offer you a different perspective (not saying or implying your read is incorrect) which may help you out a bit. It can be a teaching tool to make you realize that "your" understanding is what may need the changing. ( which will eventually strengthen your faith and service) That's a...

That may be true and I respect your opinion but that doesn't alter what asked and why

To start with, they deny Jesus is the only Son of the Living God and the only way to Salvation and actually end with universal salvation but lets assume that's off the table. They were given all this through magic glasses allegedly from an angel names "Moroni". ( not how that works) No one...

That's not the correct transliteration as I said. There's a lot more to translation than reading a dictionary. The sooner you realize that, the less errors you will make. I see great promise in you.

Actually, in context it is when viewed in light of the times, circumstances and competing religions present when Paul wrote these things. Unlike us with our centuries of information and modern communication to draw on, these "Christians' were "brand new", most probably came from pagan religions...

I've actually been on both ends and seen it all 3 ways. (tactical, strategic and muzzle to muzzle) Victim? no but I can meet you half way on casualty Sadly, that's always been the case and always will be the case

It was in reference to your post commenting on "why" the person made the decisions they did. "Why" a person decides to sin doesn't factor in when the question is guilt or innocence. It "can" have a bearing on punishment and/or atonement ( but that's another discussion beyond the scope of this...

I have been on the outside and literally at ground zero and this isn't a debate about "endless" wars from numerous perspectives. And as far as service, I have more time in than you (not counting civilian time) Regarding views, I put more stock and faith in the "views" of those on the front...

Exactly when is this "age of accountability" and what authority sets it?

What you seem to have is serious contextual and transliteration issues. In the day of the writing, The Kingdom of Israel was "dispersed" and what "was" Judea was mongrelized even to the point Samaritans were half and half. This was also when the Talmud (traditions) crept in and displaced much...

Its more of a definition swapping between "English" use versus context in the original language (more transliteration) "Saved" ( or salvation the state, process or condition) simply and only means to be rescued or delivered from. It needs a qualifier ( usually the context of the usage or...

thats a good point- to a degree. Everything has a root cause, prime mover, enabler etc. And with the CSI effect, everybody wants a motive wrapped up in a nice neat package. Reality is that "motive" (albeit nice to have) is not required for a conviction and nowhere does God consider it when...

No, it was correct the first time. Many people use the circular reasoning of this for various reasons but .. There is a significant difference between "reading" and doing a detailed analytical study complete with vetting and other tests for the data. Then we have the other influences such as...

Is this "assessment" from decades of physical experience actually on the ground doing it or an internet opinion?