Search results

YHWH is NOT a dabar. He has a dabar. So now the Son is no longer the logos? Now its the Father? All I used to hear from Christians is "Jesus is the Word". Now I am hearing, "YHVH is THE word". It is amazing how error continues to morph into new error.

Loophole? Then for almost two hundred years prior to the KJV, all Christians were deceived by that "loophole". Hardly. Now that the KJV has CHANGED "it" to "him" and all ensuing versions follow their error, the false teaching of the "divinity of Jesus" has taken firm root. They have made a man...

Yes, "it" is singular. It refers to the "logos". "Logos" was the Greek word used for the Hebrew "dabar" as in Jeremiah 1:4-5; Jer 1:4 Then the word [Hebrew dabar; Greek logos] of YHWH came unto me, saying, Jer 1:5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out...

That is so sad. I feel sorry for you. You have come so far in your walk as the Spirit led you, but now you won't walk any further? You believe you have all the truth now and cannot receive anything further from the Holy Spirit?

When did the first person enter the Kingdom? Could anyone enter the Kingdom before Yeshua or does he have the preeminence in that? Could anyone enter the Kingdom before Yeshua resurrected? I think not.

Using "it" is not calling God an "it". "It" refers to God's thoughts and words which are things that YHWH used when He spoke all things into existence. It does not refer to God Himself.

The Geneva translators were honest about the logos being a thing, but they misunderstood the other NT verses concerning the Son.

Trinitarians teach that Yeshua is the Creator; that he made all things. They believe this because of verses that use "by him" or "by whom" such as Hebrews 1:2, Colossians 1:16, etc. Translating it that way destroys the Scriptural teaching that Yeshua's Father YHWH is our only Creator. It is...

Actually, it is a gigantic difference. "By whom" implies Yeshua is the Creator and "through whom" means YHWH is the Creator. Nothing was made by Yeshua. Father YHWH spoke everything into existence all by Himself (Isaiah 44:24) using the breath of His mouth (His spoken words - Psalms 33:6). YHWH...

Yes, "through whom", not "by whom" as trinitarian biased Bibles like to read.

This king has searched out the matter and found your doctrine false. Heb 1:1 God [Yeshua's Father YHWH], who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom He hath appointed heir of...

The logos (the Father's thoughts, plan, spoken words) became flesh (Yeshua). Yeshua dwelt among us and so did YHWH IN Messiah. 2 Corinthians 5:19 To wit, that God (YHWH) was IN Messiah, reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the...

You have been indoctrinated into the trinity belief by your mentors. One can have a teachable spirit and be taught error and willingly accept it which is what you have done.

It is bad enough how you denigrate those who don't believe like you, but now you have gone too far. You call truth "a load of poop" and exude all your vile filth upon it. I thought I was dealing with a wayward believer who needed correction, but you are nothing but a filthy blasphemer. We are done.

I didn't say he won't enter the Kingdom. He is not in it yet. Only those who are in Messiah have entered. If you disagree with me, then explain why John is not as great as the least in the Kingdom. How can the greatest prophet not be one of the greatest in the Kingdom?

Yes, I do know better than you in this regard. The Father (God) and the Son (Yeshua) are both exceptions. Yeshua was sinless for two reasons 1) He was free of Adam's sin since he doesn't have a human father and 2) He obeyed every OT command that pertained to him.

Yeshua is speaking of prophets up until his day which is why even the least in the Kingdom of God will be greater than John. Why? Because John was not in the Kingdom.

Where are we told our atoning sacrifice had to be perfect in the sense that God is perfect?

12 And in none other is there salvation: for neither is there any other name under heaven, that is given among men, wherein we must be saved. YHWH is not "under heaven". Nor is He "given", but is the "giver".

You have misunderstood those words about John. He is not the greatest man, but the greatest prophet (Luke 7:28).