Search results

Why do you promote a doctrine (dispensational eschatology) that teaches God has TWO Covenants of Grace, one for ethnic Israel and the other for the Church?

How would you know what is or is not correct since you admit you have NOT studied, nor do you understand Covenant Theology? You argue against doctrine that has been foundational from the beginning of man. Do you even know what the unconditional Covenant of God to mankind according to grace...

I agree that AI replies here defend the naked Word of God! We (believers) too, like AI have the naked Word of God and through diligent study of the Word, believers can and have arrived at the same logical conclusions. Since I have not mastered all of history, or other languages, I will often...

You may as well be speaking to the wall! I appreciate your thorough study, but dispensationalists never will!

Thank You TS!

Absolutely! Look forward to reading. Thanks again!

I plan to copy your replies here TS, because my memory is not what it used to be and I believe you have presented excellent biblical understanding here. Thank you!

Excellent understanding TS!

I concur! It's obvious FP is not biblical to anyone who studies the Bible without having been taught to embrace full preterism!

How did Christ "invisibly" return in 70 AD if not Spirit? I have little interest in what unbelieving historians record, unless what is recorded can be proven through the Word of God! What part or creature within God's creation have not heard the gospel of the Kingdom of God and long for...

Yes, Christ says when the Son of man returns in the clouds of heaven, His coming again would be visible to ALL the tribes of earth. But you want us to believe that Christ came invisibly (spiritually?) in 70 AD??? Too bad there is not a single verse to prove your independent historians SAW what...

No you're talking about 70 AD, as though you know it proves Christ returned spiritually at that time.

Have you not read the many warnings written throughout the prophets of what would come to pass when Israel became apostate and turned away from God? Even Christ says their house would be left desolate because they would not bless He that cometh in the name of the Lord? This prophesy is both...

So what??? The historical evidence is based on what others were told. Yes, Jesus did foretell ALL that would come to pass when the Son of man comes again!

History only recognizes prophecies physically fulfilled! Historical record does NOT recognize SPIRITUAL fulfillment of what is written in the Word of God, especially if those recording history are in unbelief!

This is selectively reading verses out of context. Include verse 2 where Paul shows us how both the dead and the living are judged as the gospel of the Kingdom of God is PREACHED! Man is NOW (since Christ came to earth a man) being judged according to how we respond to the GOSPEL proclaimed...

Matthew 24:30 (KJV) And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. Matthew 24:31 (KJV) And he shall send his angels with a great sound of...

Of course, FP don't teach a bodily return of Christ! Since a bodily return in AD 70 did not happen, as I've said, FP must dream up a spiritual return of Christ then! That's one of the problems with FP doctrine. There was no return of Christ spiritually or bodily in AD 70! What there was is...

We've had this discussion before! Your doctrine cannot be biblically or historically proven sound! FP is a doctrine built on man's imagination!

What I find a very convenient tactic of full preterists is how they link everything physical to AD 70 and the literal destruction. But when it becomes obvious because there is not historical or biblical proof for things like the second coming of Christ in the clouds in AD 70, they try very hard...