Search results

You are calling GodsGrace a non-Christian??

There are three key words in those verses that need consideration; snatch (Greek - harpadzo - seize) and out of (Greek - ek). The picture is of a man reaching into the Father's hand from outside of it, seizing the one in it, and snatching them out of the hand. That would be impossible. It is not...

I heed the warning that verse proclaims in context by believing that Yeshua is from above and not of this world (verse 23) which you conveniently ignore since it establishes the context. I guess the blind man in John 9 is also the great I AM since, when identifying himself, he said, "I am"...

That is your false interpretation of one verse and therefore, your judgment.

Easy words to say. I can say the same thing. If I were to say such a thing (which I wouldn't), here is how I would say it; The true and faithful doctrine of the non-deity of Yeshua Messiah will not be received by the natural man (1 Corinthians 2:13-14); you must receive the Holy Spirit if you...

All things were created by YHWH "through Yeshua", not "by Yeshua". When YHWH created, He did so alone by speaking things into existence (Isaiah 44:24; Psalm 33:6,9; and a host of others). Surely you jest. That passage is saying that because Yeshua built the house (referring to all the children...

The difference is, you say Yeshua is YHWH, but you can't say believer A is also believer B and also believer C. You make the Father and Son literally the same being, but you can't say the same of believers. Also, "Elohim" is not a family of God beings. Men are called "elohim" as well (Psalm...

Of course it doesn't contradict. You say the oneness between the Father and Son is a oneness of being, but that would mean the oneness of believers is also a oneness of being. Impossible. I say the oneness of all concerned is a oneness of purpose.

It is believed by many that the word "echad," translated "one," means "a united one" or a "compound unity," not singularity. The scriptures prove this belief to be false. Note Numbers 7:13-82 where "echad" is translated "one" 84 times and each time it means one as in the number one, singularity...

I totally agree verse 14 is referring to Yeshua. Trinitarians believe the logos/word was the Son who was then made flesh. A "he" was made a "he". I believe the logos/word was the Father's thoughts, plans, spoken words that were made flesh. An "it" was made a "he". I thought you believed the same...

What leads you to believe that other than reading the Son into John 1:1? Yes, YHWH is one (the Father). He is not two (the Father and the Son).

Not one of those references, nor any other reference in the entire Bible, calls Yeshua "God Almighty" or even "the Almighty". It is NOT a title of Yeshua. In fact, the following verses make a clear distinction between the Almighty and Yeshua. Rev 19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword...

Acts 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God (Father YHWH) hath made that same Yeshua, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Messiah. The "only true God" made Yeshua to be Lord and Messiah over us. He did NOT make Himself to be our Lord and Messiah. YHWH has always...

I just addressed this in post #1214. Yes, it refers to Yeshua.

I agree with everything you wrote except the last sentence. There is a gigantic difference between Yeshua being "Lord" and him being "LORD God" ("YHWH Elohim"). The fact that YHWH and Yeshua are both called "Lord" does not make them the same being any more than Yeshua and Cyrus both being called...

They both mean "Lord" or "Master" or "Sovereign".

The article found here addresses the issue of "it" or "he" in John 1:1-4 perfectly clear.

"LORD" is NOT the name of God. The Father is only called "LORD" by the faulty translations and substitutes of men. The Scriptures call the Father "YHWH". The Scriptures also call the Father "Lord" or "Master" as a translation of the Hebrew "Adon" and/or "Adonai" or of the Greek "Kurios". It is...

Yes, a 100% human child is born to a human mother. The son is given to us by YHWH. YHWH puts the government upon his shoulders. The Hebrew for "the mighty God" is "el gibbor" which can be translated "mighty warrior" or "mighty el". Since Yeshua is NOT the "only true God" (John 17:3), the verse...

Nothing strange here. Yeshua is speaking of a future time through prophecy as he has done elsewhere (Psalm 22:1 for example). He says YHWH of hosts sent him. That shows Yeshua is not YHWH of hosts. Again, YHWH of hosts sent Yeshua in verse 11. All the "Lord"s in both verses = "YHWH" in the...