Search results

That is simply a lame excuse on you rpart to retranslate Scriptures that are written literally to com eup wiht a "spiritual meaning". It is really easy to know what should be taken literally and what not. It is called the golden rule of bible interpretation. Rule 3: The Golden Rule of...

YOu already did. YOu told us here that What was writtenn in Jer. 31 is not what was meant and that we have to find the spiritual meanings of th ebible. YOu showed that there is otrher definitions other than what is written. No my brother it is you who are lying about what you have written on...

You are a typical Cult leader wannabe> You seek to reinterpret SCripture and call it "the deeper things of God" so people have to rely on your special relatiosnhip with god who tells you what He really meant which is different that what He inspired the Apostles to write as well as the OT...

YOu really are arrogant and naive. You think you can just hit google and get to know all about Catholicism? Well you can but it takes many many hours of reading to do so which I know you haven't done. But if you think you have good knowledge, please tell us what a second grade Catholic school...

No I agree with Paul 100% But I totally disagree with you when y7ou say that the bible in its plain passages does not mean what it says but has a different emaning than wht the words say. And I am not talking qabout teh very clear and obvious symbolic passages so don't go there.

I know how I take it literally, but it requires more than a first grade understanding of grammar as you have demonstrated. Getting back to Hebrews 8 I will once again ask you to show when these terms of the covenant were fullied: Hebrews 8:6-13 King James Version 6 But now hath he obtained...

Nice to see you straining at a gnat (small g) while you swallow camels and make judgments without ascertaining facts! Not a Christian thing to do. I never siad it is Gods will for most people to go to hell. Thgat is you making lying assumptions about my beliefs. Have the last word, If you...

Well Jesus physically retuned over 1000 years before Rev. 21 . the bible doesn't say He went back to heaven so you are merely making assumptions as to where He went after He physically returned at the battle of Armageddon.

Still waiting for you to show when the terms of the new covenant as spelled out in Jer31 and Heb 8 were fulfilled completely as you said. So are you aaying there was no orthodox Christianity at all from c. 500AD until hte mid 1300's? RCC was about the only sect around except for small small...

Thgis is what the cults and occult do. What you believe is simply worded this way: I know what the words in Scripture say, but they really mean this". It is what every denier does to justify reinterpreting Scripture.

Did you spend dozens of hours going through Canon Law? Did you go and learn the Baltimore Catechism? Have you even read a pre and post Vatican 2 catechism? Or on the internet did you pore over a catholic catechism? Or are you just once again bloviating!

How about the word of God despite what Romanism taught.

So maybe the JW's are right when they say Jesus did not physically rise from the dead. After all they Got that from the Holy spirit in the same way you get your "deeper meanings". I know others call that reading between the lines, god calles it rewriting Scripture.

So God no longer remembers the sin sof Israel and all Jews no longer need to be taught to know th eLord? That is what God said He would do in the covenant. Let me refresh you rmemory Hebrews 8:8-13 King James Version 8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith...

Well as you say it is completely fufliled so then you should have no problem pointing to a point in time and saying thse are where the terms oif the covenant were completely fuflilled. Let me refresh your memory on the Covenant and the terms god laid out. Jeremiah 31:31-37 King James Version...

Well actually HIs return is shown earlier: Revelation 19:11-21 King James Version 11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head...

So you reject the physical return of Jesus to earth.

So you do reject the physical return of Jesus as He said He will do. Okay. You are wrong for Jesus said He would return and there are many passages showing His return. If God is omnipresent, How can Jesus be seperated from the Father at any point? Matt. 25, Acts 1, Rev. 19 all show Jesus...

Well the construct shows they asked three questions not two. I will go with what is written and not with what some try to guess the "spiritual meaning". Yes when Jesus physically returns, they will be saved and unsaved. That is the judgment of Matt. 25: 31-46. They will not have mortal...

Well as you accused me of not knowing Catholicism and I said you suck at knowing me this answer is asinine! I never implied you didn't know Catholicism, I was answering your accusation of me not knowing much.