Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    No you're still wrong. Jesus said on the Day of the Lord He would gather the Elect. Mt 24:29“Immediately after the distress of those days “ ‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’ 30 “Then will...
  2. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Don't believe everything you think. The truth is not determined by democratic vote. [edited] A foolish notion. Jesus said the Great Tribulation will be cut short. Keras says not only does it go the full length of the rest of the one 'seven', it's lengthened by another 30 days. Jesus says no...
  3. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Jesus is not constrained to the earth after He returns. He was mobile in death, not bound to the bosom of Abraham, but He was able to go that deep dark place where the spirits from the time of Noah have been imprisoned and He made an announcement to them (and no, He did not "preach" to them...
  4. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Ah, lots of concealed condemnation, and not one serious inquiry or criticism. It's not a prediction: it's a sequence of the major linear narratives in the books of Daniel, Matthew, 1st and 2nd Thessalonians, and the book of Revelation. You can't handle it? Better stick with keras then.
  5. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Yes, I know how because it's in prophecy, and while no one can know when Jesus will come for us, we will know the time is ripe because Jesus told us through prophecy what will happen just before it. You see, unlike you, I don't take an emotional view of prophecy on a feel-good basis, and...
  6. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    And the truth is not determined by democratic vote, thank God.
  7. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Isaiah 30:26 does not relate to the Day of the Lord as keras teaches. He also teaches that Heaven will be here on earth, i.e., his reference to meeting you in the "Holy Land". That he questions my salvation by suggesting I won't be with you two there, is one of those mocking little insults I...
  8. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Proverbs 9:7 Whoever corrects a mocker invites insults; whoever rebukes the wicked incurs abuse. --NIV
  9. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    So what. There is a literary break between verse 26 and 27, that you confuse two different messages (and Isaiah, at times, represents a kaleidoscope of visions one right after another) is not surprising when you wish to make the Bible say what you want to say. That is the mark of a poor...
  10. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Isaiah 30:26 The light of the moon will be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun will be seven times brighter, like the light of seven days, on the day the Lord binds up the fracture of His people and heals the bruise He has inflicted. This is not a Day of the Lord verse. On the...
  11. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Love corrects. Wise men appreciate correction. Fools are incapable of changing their tune.
  12. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Then don't be angry bard. I'm not. I'm just not going to participate in this foolishness. Fair warning to the three or four people reading this missive: exploding suns are NOT part of any Bible prophecy. And even though fire is a component of the Day of the Lord, we need not worry about...
  13. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Foolish abounds. Isa 30:26 is not related to the Day of the Lord.
  14. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Again with the scolding. I guess I ought to say he just makes himself look stupid and then you would laud me again. keras does not have many true insights worth learning. His eschatology is like throwing darts blindfolded. Most are stuck in the wall but here or there one finds a target...
  15. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Without context, you might be deluded into thinking keras has a point, but read for yourself the passages from which he draws his fanciful notion and you'll see they are not related to the Day of the Lord at all. Meanwhile he'll just sit there like a weeble wooble and just keep popping up no...
  16. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    A coronal mass ejection might fry some unprotected electronics, but the rest of Keras' hysterical projection is about as accurate as the possibility of the Day of the Lord happening with last night's bloodmoon.
  17. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    Well if you knew the real sequence of events you wouldn't have put your foot in your mouth by even putting today out there as a possibility. There is no abomination desolation, no Temple, and the one 'seven' hasn't even started! And as another poster put up the relative verses which you can't...
  18. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    So another prediction falls flat on its face.
  19. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    The added detail that gives us the reason that the Elect would otherwise be eliminated are verse 13:14-15. The two laws which are out into effect are coincidental with the talking image which describes the abomination(s) desolation of My 24:15. And unlike what you describe in past and present...
  20. Marcus O'Reillius

    The Wrath of the Lord

    "Taken" comes from paralambano which is the same word which is translated as RECEIVING CHRIST. Noah was taken into the Ark, Lot was taken away from Sodom. Both were rescued and then immediately after, the wicked - who were left behind - were killed.