Search results

Christian morality is a reflection of Gods character. It is not determined by men. We find it explained through out the bible.

Fear of what? Doubts, there is nothing wrong/sinful about doubts, so long as one looks for answers. Do I doubt, constantly. No one has the absolute answer to every question. Do I have assurance of Salvation? most definetly as I know it is Jesus who holds onto my faith, not me holding onto him.

You raise two issues. Was there a global flood and what to do about rising sea levels? Well 99% of your questions about the Flood are answered by answersingenesis or creation.com The remaining 1% is whether you have the faith to believe God. As to increased flood risks. Don't live in an...

Your basic responce is to ask, How, what and why? What evidence do they have for that belief? Why do they belief that when they have no evidence for it? How do they explain this believe when scientific evidence points to the universe having a begining? Try this link:- Atheist gets her PhD in...

As I didn't post that, its meaningles to me. I posted about Christian morality.

Paul tooked about the discipline of a Christian living using the illistration of a solder and of an athlete, neither of whom have freedom to abandon the training they are under going. Further he talks about God being a God of order not chaos. So how does your spontinaityfit in with the set...

Of course. We constantly fail at imitating Jesus. I for one am looking forward to reading your posts as you seek to show us how we can all do better. Christian fail at being copies of Jesus. What is the excuse atheists use for being less than pefect human beings?

As with programes like biblegateway it ios very easy to check what different versions say in the same passage, so checking only 7 versions is laziness. Why the difference, with some bibles having the long ending to R8:1 and some not. Again had you done more researcg you would find an...

Depends what you mean by spontaneous? If you mean to suddenly leave work, home and go and leave anywhere in the world. Or to abandon ones family, church and friends in order to run off with another younger woman? If yopu mean to abandon promises one has made and to go and make new promises that...

Without the new Testiment we donot know what we have in Christ. Your arguement depends on the very thing you dispise.

Interesting you cut short the quote. is it enough only to study scripture, is there no responcibility to listen to what the spirit is saying as one studies it?

Yet Paul could boast about not using secret ways in the proclomation of the gospel, the very thing you are saying God uses, in what is mans addition to the bible. Two things that make me reluctant to believe what you are posting.

Are you saying that Jesus's sacrifice is incomplete? or is this some weird believe that the church will be completed at Jesus's 2nd coming, that other weird things will happen top fulfill some obscure verse can be completed?

And history is full of people who playing with numbers have found all sorts of things in the bible. The wonder of the gospel is it can be explained to small children so they understan, but also to university professors so they can understand. If we have that what need is there for...

Yes we should study the bible, even memorise it, but that is not enough. Don't forget Jesus never rebuked the scribes or the pharsees for the lack of biblical knowledge. He recognised they knew, had memorised chunks of it, that they studied it, but They were not open to what it was saying...

And you haven't applied what Jesus said to them. ' Even if someone rose from the dead they would not believe.' Yes it is in a parable but the truth in this statement can be seen by asking your known atheist/agnostics what they think of Jesus's resurection. It happened, but they don't believe...

No it not what we hold on to but who. Doctrine pr works do not save only faith in Jesus saves us.

"the body of Christ, in this dispensation has not been given the new testament." If that is true why do you quote from it? Either we have the NT in which case your arguement is pointless or we don't have it. In which case what were you quoting from, that was not the OT?

There is also a serious side to this. Posts are made that are wrong either because of ignborance or because of the intent to teach falsehood. Sometimes those of us who like to squable jump far to hard on the ignorant and not hard enough or the decivers. I'm assuming a deciever cannot be...