Search results

No, unlike that, because I am telling the truth according to the Bible--the same Bible that, speaking in love, defines sodomy as sin, and which truth you hate. All I'm saying is that the Bible is correct.

In Christianity, this is what is known as "false accusation".

"What is love? Baby, don't hurt me! Don't hurt me! No more!" LOL God's Word is love--you hate the Word, so you hate love.

This is all untrue and irrelevant. To reiterate my point your critique rests upon intentionally ignoring: the Law instructed, "Respect God by keeping vows you make in His Name", but Christ says, "Respect God by making no vows." So, I fully furnished you with the "ACT" whereby Christ said God...

No, that's not what he said. He said DEALING WITH IT AS SIN should not be oversimplified (and it really shouldn't be--people have hearts that can be fragile, and must be handled with care), but he did not say IDENTIFYING IT AS SIN was "complex". That part, the subject of the thread, is simple...

Sorry, just gotta keep things straight--but praise God for what He did in your case with your own :Shining:

Everyone should know God loves them--because Christ died for their sins. Denying you have sinned, however (like saying sodomy isn't sinful), makes it seem like Christ died in vain, that God is some kind of a liar--He erred in saying you sinned, and He erred in accounting that you needed His Son...

Their definition of love is an abomination to us, and our definition of love is an abomination to them--darkness and light have no fellowship, flesh is contrary to spirit, their god hates God.

This thread isn't about how to deal with it, it's merely establishing the Biblical view on the issue.

Christianity teaches it.

In what way did I fail to explain how Christ defined the "ACT" of respect there? Just like you cherry pick the Bible words that suit you, and end up giving false impressions of the Bible, you cherry picked my words and gave the false impression I somehow came up short. I specified the way in...

You're obviously unacquainted with, and uninterested in, Christianity--I tried explaining it to you, you brushed it off. Again, you're here for one reason, and one reason only: you're not here to discuss anything, you're here to try to cause Christians to accept sodomy. You're not open to the facts.

The Christians had the internal fortitude that having a clear conscience affords. How do I know Christians have a clear conscience? Peter tells you: "water baptism is an appeal to God for a clear conscience". You don't think God cleanses the conscience through baptism? Paul also said, "my...

*brother

They gave us the ignore button because they knew people would arrive at points of strong disagreement--they literally made the forum for people like myself.

If it doesn't mean what I say I think it means--eternal life is a harvest reaped in due time by those who do not grow weary in doing good to all men--you're free to tell everyone what the true meaning is.

See? It's exactly as I said--he wants to smuggle homosexuality into Christianity! Just as everything else I've said is true. When Christians were "rejected" by society, in ancient Rome, they didn't commit suicide, because their consciences were clear, because they weren't committing...

This issue is exceedingly simple to understand--these people pretending not to understand want to give the impression there is obscurity as a front to smuggle sodomy into Christianity. Nope, not happening!

If not, then how do you reconcile the fact that Christ both upholds the Law and countermands the Law? Both of those are facts--He upholds the Law AND cancels some Laws. That's literally why He had to clarify He WAS NOT coming to do away with Torah--because He DID remove some laws (He says vows...

An honest person sees inconsistency, and makes inquiry as to how to reconcile and restore coherence--you, on the other hand, are just throwing verses away, and attacking people who raise those verses to point out your incoherence to help you restore coherence. You're not being helpful.