Search results

And of course, I have soundly refuted you with scripture time and time again.

The grace of God has in fact been extended to me; but you are projecting your own lack of salvation onto me... for grace has never been extended to you. Because in saying that of me, you have three fingers pointing back at you. Whether that statement seems trite to you or not matters not to...

Yes...especially Galatians 5:19-21... Which tells us that if we walk in the flesh we will not inherit the kingdom... And indicates that if you want to inherit the kingdom you need to cease working the works of the flesh. That means REPENT.

Reportable as a violation of the rules. You are projecting your own lack of salvation onto me.

You mean, like you are always attacking me and my doctrine? For a while there, I started calling you "Blood Blot 1953"... I repented. However, you have never repented of calling me "justbyfaithplusluckyrepentance" It should be clear that the descendants of the free woman have been set free...

Reportable as a violation to the moderators. You calling me a Tare makes you an accuser of the brethren. I know you don't believe it; because you have already judged my salvation on not a few occasions. But, accuser of one or more of the brethren, you are...

You'd better believe it!

You seem to me to be evading the real question here.

Jhn 9:27, He answered them, I have told you already, and ye did not hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will ye also be his disciples?

Do you think that Jesus died only for His sheep rather than for the sins of the whole world? If that is the case, then when Jesus says, "you do not believe because you are not of my sheep" He is saying that He didn't die for those who don't currently believe in Him. They are not of His elect...

I am currently going through the book of Romans in my teaching. Commentary on Romans.

I believe that the first look of desire is in fact lust and therefore adultery (Matthew 5:27-28) and therefore sin.

If anyone desires a doctrinal statement, it is here: Wet Paint Principle (Freedom)

No doubt... Sometimes you have to proclaim a faulty doctrine for a brief moment in order to show why that doctrine is faulty in the sight of the Lord.

No that's what I'm saying to you...because I believe that your logic is faulty. Is it not true that those who believe not have the opportunity to believe in the future? But you say they are not Jesus' sheep; and that therefore Jesus didn't die for them. That would mean that they are not of...

That's because you know it's the truth.

Time will tell... However, I believe that I have been sealed by the Holy Spirit; and therefore I will be counted with the righteous on that day.

No; adultery can be stealing; but I don't see stealing to be adultery. How do you figure?

Let me put it this way... If those who do not believe are not Jesus' sheep, and Jesus only died for His sheep, then does it not follow that those who do not currently believe, Jesus did not die for them?