Search results

Well, we've laid out our views, haven't we? All we can do now is leave it up to the readers to decide for themselves who has produced a more compelling argument from Scripture. I'm not moving you with what I've said from Scripture, and your empty clanging isn't convincing me, so we can move on.

Oops, in the exact same context, Paul says he is convinced nothing is unclean in itself! LOL! You don't know the Word.

The guy is possessed of idiocy--he outright rebels against the reality that Christ CONDEMNS the practice of some Torah Laws as "of the evil one" (Mt 5). His skull is impervious to Truth! Not something to be proud of but here he is ranting and raving emptily as if he had something to say! God...

LOL! Actually, all your empty rambling, and taking a single verse out of context, does nothing to convince someone who is appraised of the entire context.

Yeah, and apparently God has no "Law" concerning 7th Day Sabbath, since He never convicted me to keep it.

I leave it to the readers to read all the refutations I've already provided--you're definitely not reading them, or you are acting as if you aren't. LOL

Romans 14 shows that observing a day as special is a personal matter, and is not binding on everyone, but you don't care, you're lawless against the Scripture.

"The righteous requirement of the Law" refers to the righteous things the Law of Moses required--there is no other (righteous) "Law" in view in Romans.

You are allergic to truth. The context shows that it has nothing to do with Sabbath keeping, because the "rest" is what the Israelites fell short of when God said "I swore in My wrath, they shall not enter My rest" and "Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts". It's talking about...

And what ever it is you believe in leads you to contradict the NT teachings, so you shouldn't being throwing stones. LOL

I see the moment from the film, which I do not re-watch, as a moment of reckoning--what all these conversations are about.

The Law has good commands, but we do not have goodness, so the Law is "weak" because it relies on sinful flesh (Ro 8:3; Gal 3:3); those who walk by the spirit fulfill the righteous requirement of the Law, as I've already stated so many times. Romans 2 refers to Gentile believers ("who show the...

Quit wasting peoples' time. You don't have an argument. Anyone who eats what he doesn't believe he should eat, even if it is clean for someone else, is eating an "abomination" for him and is "condemned" (Ro 14:5, 23), "storing up wrath" (Ro 2).

He never raised that argument, you just have a verse you're stumbling over. You should really ask the Lord about it instead of going about contradicting Paul, who knew Isaiah 66, who has given us authoritative exegesis. It seems like you don't even read what people write--it wasn't the...

Nope, Christ, affirming the Spirit of the Law, nullifies various Torah Laws (Mt 5, 19). The Gentile believers were deemed "doers of the Law" without even knowing the Law (Ro 2:13-16, 26, 27). If what you teach were valid, this would be impossible. Don't you consider those who don't live by the...

Sounds good.

Well, YOU have to hold to the NT exegesis of the OT Scriptures done by Paul the Apostle--that is what I am doing. When I see that there is NOT a requirement that all hold to the same view and practice concerning observance of days or classifications of clean and unclean, but are free to walk in...

Right, my points stand unopposed and unanswered. Thanks for discussing!

1. It's entirely reasonable to understand the distinction was not for the purpose of delineating which was "edible", since man ate NO meat until after the flood, yet the distinction was given before the flood! LOL And afterward the fear of man fell on the creatures, and those animals were for...

The righteous requirement of the Law is fulfilled in those who walk after the Spirit (Ro 8:4)--the entire Law is fulfilled in loving one's neighbor, and doing him no harm (Ro 13:8-10). Nope, that was for the old creation, and we are a new creation, so it doesn't pertain to us. "Resting from...