Search results

Revelation 19 is the simultaneous details of Luke 17:28. I don't think that Premils understand how an "iron rod" makes "shivers" (Revelation 2:27), or what the purpose of a "threshingfloor" is (Daniel 2:35). Immediately after our resurrection into the likeness of Christ's immortality, the...

After Christ returns in all His fiery Glory, Premillennialists want to believe against Christ's own words in the Gospels, that this earth still has a future with unsaved people, who have escaped His wrath. If that be so, then the only ones who that could be, are those who received the "mark of...

No, I am not insulting you or anyone else here! It's a common problem among all professing Christians. Many are Born again of God's Holy Spirit, and are sealed unto the Day of redemption, but they are being side tracked by the "tares" that have not been born again. The unsaved are among the...

You are attempting to discern and interpret God's spiritual things through your natural mind, and then launch it all by your religious persuasion, thinking that God's thoughts and ways are like yours. If you do have the Mind of Christ, it is evident that you are not utilizing it. 1 Corinthians...

Rom.8[9] But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. If therefore those who are not born again of the Holy Spirit, are declared by Him as being "none of His", who then do they...

According to the Amillennial view, It is evident that we all three think a like in The Spirit, which defeats the assumptions and false accusations of those who oppose it. "There can always be more than one lie, but there can never be more than one truth"- Earburner

Isa.55[8] For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. Zech.4[6] Then he answered and spake unto me, saying, This is the word of the LORD unto Zerubbabel, saying, Not by might [natural self will], nor by power [religious persuasion], but by my spirit...

Because you have a misunderstanding of the parable of the "strongman", you have a false conclusion of how and when satan is being bound. Matthew 12:29, Mark 3:27, Luke 11:21. Read all three together, overlapping each other as one, then discern by the Lord's Holy Spirit, of what the words...

It's not "what" is new Heavenly Jerusalem, but rather "who" is new Heavenly Jerusalem? Clue: 2Cor.5[17] Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature [creation]: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. Gal.4[26] But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the...

If you have accepted the truth of Isaiah 55:8-9 and Revelation 1:1, then you should understand that when God the Father speaks prophetic words, He is speaking in the past, present and future, ALL AT THE SAME TIME. Our myopic, linear thinking, natural minds cannot do that. Hence the reason of WHY...

Reading the book of Revelation verbatim, and attempting to interpret it through the natural mind, is the worst mistake that anyone can do for understanding God the Father's prophecy, given to His Son, given to the angel, to give to John. KJV Revelation 1:1. Isaiah 55:8-9, Zechariah 4:6 and John...

Yes! A jungle of "tares" mixed in with "wheat". That's been happening for hundreds of years within our churches. Some are Pastors and Bible teachers, and yes, even in the Bible Colleges! However, here is the discerning factor: Rom.8[9] But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be...

Correct. Paul said it this way: 1 Cor. 2[4] And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: [5] That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but [rather] in the power of God. [6] Howbeit we speak wisdom...

Jesus is NOT dead, and neither is John the Baptist. For Jesus, I should not have to explain, but as for John, by many neglecting God's Holy Spirit for guidance, they are ignorant* about him and where he is now. Aside from Jesus, who He Himself is the most "least in the KoG", Jesus said...

You just opened their can of worms! Get ready to read book long postings, for explanations of their speculations.

This Amillennialist understands and knows that the two anointed ones were John the Baptist and Jesus.

Davy wrote: "Not really, and I ain't no Amillennialist." Earburner's reply: That's unfortunate that you are not an Amillennialist. The Amillennial interpretation is far less confusing, than what you have shown here.

It doesn't say that in Genesis. Edit: I think you got your theory mixed up. Jesus CAME FROM eternity, Adam did not. For the Eternal Christ, that was the actual case. Heb.10[5] Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou...

Are you saying that God created Adam from the dirt, and then filled him with Eternal life, by giving him an Eternally living soul? As I have previously shown, I strongly disagree. Originally, through the "seed" of Adam, we are all decendants of him, having no eternal existence of any kind...

1st fundamental: Gen.2[7] And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life [oxygenated air]; and man became a living soul. > In other words, Adam, as well as all AIR breathing flesh, didn't get or receive a living soul. See also KJV-...