Search results

​As I have already told you, the verses do not need any explanation as they are self explanatory. You have gone out of your way to let me know that you know everything and I know nothing so why is it that you can't see what is so obvious. I guess to admit to that fact would mean admitting what...

I see you are being rude and offensive again so I have reported you to the moderators...again.

​And how many denominations can boast a membership of 85 million? You do like splitting hairs don't you. I get the impression you have membership of one.

​Just as a matter of interest. Why did you say the word appeared in the gospels 8 times and then you said it appeared 88 times? That doesn't give the impression that you know what you are saying and that you say anything if you think it will get you the upper hand.

As you have not done an indepth study of the NTC, you will forgive me that I don't see you as an authority on the subject.

I never said no such thing.

Once again you have called me a liar so I have once again reported you to the moderators.

You are calling me a liar again so I have reported you to the moderators...again. When I studies the NTC, feelings never entered the equation. I guess you comment that the whole of the NT relates to the NTC gets you off the hook and allows you to make claims about me that are untrue.

I would like to but you make it very difficult.

​But when it is pejorative, it is not acceptable. I expect that from atheists, not christians.

So my post that set out my education is an error? or a lie? Do tell me!!

That is not proof that she taught men.

Simple headings in a larger font? I don't think so as no one needs to use headings THAT LARGE AND BOLDED.

The Anglican Church has an estimated membership of 85 million. if that is not a majority I do not know what is. Once again you are calling me a liar so I will report it to the moderators.

How come the people on this board cannot answer for themselves?

​What style? As I said, I cannot understand abstracts. For the autistic person that is introducing new ideas without explaining them which is what "used to that style" is.

​The barrd posts a list of women's names without comment and it is not a red herring. I post a list of men's names without comment and it is a red herring. You will have to forgive me if I take that with a grain of salt. Ever heard the saying "what is good for the goose is good for the gander?"

As I have no idea what an abstract type of wage is, It would be very difficult for me to assert anything.

I mean that being autistic, I cannot decipher an abstract comment.