Search results

Our sins are MORE than just forgiven, they are wiped away! Just because you can quote the word of God, spouting the words of God, in an attempt to use them as a smearing campaign against my use of His words through His Holy Spirit, informs me that you oppose yourself most of the time, just so...

Yes! A thousand years is just that, BUT IT IS BEING APPLIED to NOW, today, ever since Pentecost. We ARE IN the metaphor of His "a thousand years", and not in some distant far off future, after our resurrection into His immortality, reigning and ruling over flesh and blood people who die, and...

^ Correction: compare Genesis 2:7 with Genesis 7:22

Who knows what you are talking about! Compare Genesis 2:7 with Genesis 2:7 and figure it out! Its not that complicated. In regards to Adam who became a living soul, as opposed to the false belief of him getting a "thing" called a soul that is eternal, that is just more religious slop...

The AoD prophesied in Daniel, WAS FULFILLED by Antiochus Epiphanes of the Seleucid (Grecian) Empire in 168 BC, aka "in the latter time of their kingdom" of the 3rd Beast. I provided to you the facts and the scriptures to support it. Please study it. When Jesus spoke of that event of the AoD...

It doesn't matter WHAT year! That methodology of mathematics is for the heady and the high minded self righteous, to keep them busy with their eyes that they can't see with, and/or theirs ears that they can't hear with. And of course church-ianity's answer is: the 70th week is missing(?), so...

^ In 2 Peter 3:8- KJV pay attention to the word "as", meaning equal to, like unto, being equivalent to, in both directions. Why is it that His thoughts say "a thousand years AS one day, and one day AS a thousand years"? Why did He say it that way?? Think!! All it means is that His Grace period...

Satan is now and has been, ever since the the death and resurrection of Christ, been bound from entering INTO BA Christians and possessing them, as he does so freely and often with the TARES. You lack spiritual understanding of who the 'strong man" is and how he operates on our level, to take...

And of course, you are only seeing the AoD from man's religious perspective, and NOT from God the Father's perspective. Isaiah 55:8-9

Earburner said: Please reference the "daily sacrifice taken away" in KJV- Daniel 9:27, as the "cause" of it being Jesus' Sacrifice, ... Oseas replied: No, I cant, it's FAKE. I don't use a false point and a satanic reference, much less take a demonic cause as whether was being a holy cause...

^ which is a prophetic fufillment of one of the six works of God- KJV- Daniel 9[24] Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, 1. to finish the transgression, and 2. to make an end of sins, and 3. to make reconciliation for iniquity, and 4. to bring in everlasting...

You might want to study the following scripture also: Hebrews 9[24] For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: [25] Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high...

I think that the word "removal" is synonymous with sins being "blotted out". Acts 3[19] Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; "Blot" Strong's G1813 ἐξαλείφω to smear out, i.e. obliterate...

Do you see how that even the mark on Cain is prophetic. It really is, by the Image of the Beast, a declaration meant to be understood as something that will keep a person "safe" from being killed.

Ron, you replied to another one of my posts to "Oseas". However I will answer. Since a BA Christian HAS the Spirit God/Christ permanently dwelling within them, are you saying that satan is a " stronger than God the Father and Jesus that dwell within us? Most all Christians are misunderstanding...

Ronald said: All true but irrelevant to the conversation Earburner's reply: You answered what I wrote to "Oseas". Between you and him, I have been discussing two different topics: Yours- about the KJV translator's error. Oseas'- about the past "abomination of desolation" .

^ is going to warn the world of his coming, and NOT show, because he is doing something else instead!

Correction: is not going to forewarn should be

And the context in the TRG is PLURAL. Therefore, using the word "the" within the plurality of the context, is correct, thus allowing the reader to understand it to be plural. You can argue this forever, but the truth be known, there is NO singular, one man band, religious miracle man to come...

^ So what I am saying is, in the TRG text there is no deviation to purposely reveal anyone in the singular, and therefore correctly leads the reader in the plural, as the context follows suit and does dictate.