Search results

Well, first nowhere did I say that one could not be circumcised. The point was obviously if they were doing it for salvation. The Galatian believers were first saved by God’s grace, and now they wanted to be circumcised in order to be saved. This was heresy was condemned at the Jerusalem...

Do you agree or disagree with Got Questions short article here? Is a backsliding Christian still saved? | GotQuestions.org

Please reconsider Paul's words to the Galatians. Paul's big points were... #1. Refuting the heresy of Circumcision Salvationism or the false belief that said you had to first be circumcised in order to be initially saved (Please slowly read: Acts of the Apostles 15:1, Acts of the Apostles...

So let me ask you. If a Christian were to look upon a woman in lust, and they got hit by a bus, and they immediately died, are they saved? I don't think they are saved because 1 John 1:9 says if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all...

Please reconsider the verses I put forth to you, friend. That's all I ask. It's not what about I say but what doth the Scripture saith?

OSAS is not true for the simple fact that the Bible teaches that one can fall away. Here are several lists of verses that makes it absolutely clear that believers can fall away from the faith: Here is a General List of Verses on How Believers Can Fall Away: Hebrews 3:12-14 Hebrews 4:11...

Sorry. The cat is already out of the bag. Unless you hit your head and totally forgot what you said, a moment back in one of your posts you claimed the following insanity. “Your not going to get to heaven because you do not commit those sins. And they are not going to hell because they commit...

Right, and the Saturday Sabbath is no longer a binding command today. This is obvious to anyone who reads Colossians 2:14-17. We are not to let others judge us in regards to whether or not we keep the Sabbaths or holy days, or dietary laws, etcetera. There are no commands given to us by Jesus...

There are two aspects of salvation. The first aspect of salvation is being saved by God’s grace in our Initial Salvation. It is also how we are foundationally saved, as well. Ephesians 2:8-9 is referring to Initial Salvation because it says how believers have been quickened (made alive)...

The whole collective Soteriology vs. individual Soteriology is purely a man invented concept to defend the false teaching of OSAS. Paul is writing to the Christians in Rome, and he is talking to them (as a group which is made up of individuals).

This is false. Hebrews 12:14 is talking about salvation because it says without holiness, no man shall see the Lord. Then it talks about Esau who was a profane person who sold his birthright. This is a warning to us believers so as not to go down the path of Esau. But if we are to believe...

Works For Salvation Verses (After We are Saved By God’s Grace): “Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.” (James 2:24). “Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.” (James 2:17). 10 “For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers...

We are justified by both faith and works. James 2:24 says we are justified by works and not by faith alone. You are simply double talking your way out of why Abraham was justified by works in James 2:21. James asks the question imply that Abraham was justified by works. It’s not saying faith...

Unless you are an immortal or a time traveler, I don’t see how that is possible, friend.

I was not talking about how you should retract what you said. I was referring to Danthemailman and his like rep on one of your posts. His like rep on one of your posts made him look guilty of the charge of justifying sin that he says OSAS does not teach. I was letting him know not to retract...

It’s not a straw man. How many sins does it take for a believer to commit before you classify them as an ungenuine believer? How many works do they need to do or how many sins do they need to overcome? You seem to have a problem before with the idea of overcoming sin because you were against...

First, there is a huge difference between justifying sin vs. battling against sin. Believers can be forgiven of their sins if they confess and forsake those sins and they don't believe they will just sin tomorrow as if they are not changed or the new man. Second, Romans 4:5-6 is dealing with...

Yes, I do see OSAS as a “sin all you want doctrine” because according to OSAS, no sin can make you unsaved. Also, there are different levels of justifying sin or evil and God is not in approval of either one. Remember, it only took one sin for the Fall to happen and not many sins (Which you...

In order to be consistent with Once Saved Always Saved, if nothing can separate you from God (whether it be one sin vs. a thousand sins), then it means you can sin as much as you want. For where is the line drawn? Two sins a week? Fives sins a month? Remember, it only took one sin for the...

Your labels and opinions don’t mean anything when we look at the Word of God. Nowhere does the Bible teach you can commit death sins and still be saved (on some level) which is what OSAS teaches. Jesus warned against how sin can destroy our soul like in Matthew 5:28-30, Matthew 6:15 (of which...