Search results

How would you understand that last quote of Jesus you quoted? I'm asking you to flesh it out a bit according to your understanding.

Peter....it appears you are only convincing yourself and then using the decoy of the trinity. Your insistence in avoiding answering our question re your claimed award sets a precedent of how you operate.

It's critical to determine the operative spirit. These settings are ripe for people being hoodwinked....and why? because they have built on a shaky foundation.

This behaviour is not understandable or was it that females where considered 'exchangeable' and of lesser value? If so we again have and example of the inversion of right and wrong

Service to others is the epitome of God's Kingdom

Eternal Almighty God has the last word on what is right and wrong. Jesus is God's final word on truth and error.....recognise it and learn to interpret accordingly. When Jesus is left out of the equation (learn also what that means) misappropriation becomes the inevitable result.

I am also interested in the award....who issued it or is it just flagrant self promotion with a total disregard for what is truth?

These are demonic manifestations. As with crop circles; some of the symbols they 'embed/ carve' into the crops are pagan ......and look how it fascinates us......just like Eve was fascinated and got beguiled by the Serpent.

you missed the point!

I don't think you understand 'paradigm'

'By their fruits you will know them'. It's got everything to do with characteristics. Can we really conclude that he who said 'love your enemies' will torment those who oppose him for eternity? That surely is an abomination and one embraced distorts what God's character is actually like...

your paradigm dictates how you see.....not Jesus

Portraying the God of unfathomable love as one who displays the characteristics of Satan is the abomination of desolation. The world has been captured by a retributive God even the religious world in general.....and for those who love this approach, the Good News is reversed and becomes 'good'...

It most definitely needs another look. The Gospel has been hijacked by popular theology and those who embrace it love it.....and so the deception is complete. Clarity begins with asking the most fundamental of questions combined with the strong desire to be self honest calling out to God for...

I have not suggested you know Ribera, I have asked whether you know him and what he taught and why

yes, it is odd in the context of popular theology and it begs the question whether this theology requires a closer look.

The Gospel initially went to only the Jews. The stoning of Stephan marked a significant change. From there on in the Gospel went to the Gentiles. This development is appropriate according to the prophecy 'seventy weeks are determined upon your people. Daniels prayer gets a quick response....he...

Sorry Douggg, this is eisegesis not exegesis. The 70 weeks are a continuum. Try to justify that it is not is being intellectually dishonest

I understand this is major for you and I would also say this, the 70 week prophecy where you break off the final week is purely arbitrary. The context does not do this, it is a continuum. You have formulated a monolithic theology around this arbitrary interpretation which in my view makes all...

Knowing thine enemy is wise. Not knowing him, well, you can guess.