Search results

Do you think God was able to translate the languages perfectly at Pentecost?

How do you know they got it right? You do realize James Strong was one of the Revisers right? How can we trust Revisers who worked with men who held to heretical beliefs? Westcott and Hort were into Catholicism. There was also an Arian on their team that they defended to keep on the Revision...

The Bible in scroll form was written first in Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic (Old Testament), and then in Koine Greek (New Testament). The Bible then moved into being written in book form by hand known as a Codex. Then the Bible moved into being in book form with the printing process. Gutenberg...

How do you know they got it right every time? That sounds like faith. Faith in the scholars. Again, Kurt Aland can be seen being all happy with the Catholic pope. Kurt Aland worked with a Catholic cardinal who was also an editor on the Nestle and Aland Critical Text. They based their work...

Uh, you do realize, Tyndale was martyred by a Catholic king and he died for his faith and he translated a Bible that had 1 John 5:7 in it. How do you know? Did you talk with the apostle Paul about it? Why are you so sure? You do realize James Strong was one of the REVISERS on the Westcott...

Not only is there the historical testimony that you ignore, when we read John 1:1 and then 1 John 5:7, it explains the Trinity nicely to us. John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” 1 John 5:7 “For there are three that bear record in heaven...

It says so right in the 27th edition that it was under the supervision of the Vatican. Whether the Catholic influence happened exactly at that point or with Westcott and Hort and their favoritism towards Catholicism is not really the point. The point is that there is a Catholic connection to...

Which Nestle and Aland Critical Text are you talking about? Is it the 25th Edition? The 26the Edition? The 27th Edition? The 28th Edition? It does not seem like they got it right the first time. It appears to be ever evolving and never settled.

The Bible was written in English just as it was written in Greek. Why was it written in Greek? Because it was the world language at the time that the Jews rejected their Messiah and salvation went out to the Gentiles (Greeks). Why not other languages at that time? Why did God only choose...

Then you have no defense for the Trinity. If you woke up on an island and you knew nothing of the Trinity, your chances of knowing about the Trinity are better if you have a King James Bible because of 1 John 5:7. Without this verse, there really is no real description of the Trinity. Also...

Here are some Textus Receptus Bibles that have 1 John 5:7: Tyndale 1534: Tyndale Bible 1534 Textus Receptus Bibles Geneva Bible 1560/1599: Geneva Bible 1560/1599 Textus Receptus Bibles Bishop's Bible 1568: Bishops Bible 1568 Textus Receptus Bibles Early Church Fathers & certain minuscules...

With the KJB translation beginning in 1604: The KJB translators worked off many manuscripts. They used the Textus Receptus English Bibles, and the Greek manuscript by Erasmus (Textus Receptus). They used the Syriac Peshitta (2nd or 3rd century) and the Old Latin and various old papyri...

But you use an English to Greek dictionary as if it is inspired by God. It still involves English in some way or you would be clueless. How do you know the religious dictionary is more accurate? For example: James Strong and his buddies did not translate the word “repent” correctly. So this...

No doubt that many can get saved by a Modern Translation. But the point here is when it comes to growth or the Sanctification of the believer.

You imply that the KJB translators added this verse out of thin air (as if they invented it). This just shows your own lack of knowing Bible history, my friend. 1 John 5:7 is actually found in the Textus Receptus English bibles that existed prior. It was in Tyndale's New Testament of 1525 -...

Yes, it's a fact that most of all Modern English were influenced by the Roman Catholic Church. Check out my post #53. Then after you have seen post #53, check out post #348.

Dear Modern Bible Scholarship Follower: The next time you read your Bible, don't read it in the English if you don't trust the English words. Try reading it in the Koine Greek. Maybe that will help you to understand the Bible? But you don't know Koine Greek, do you? Therein lies your...

Sometimes I find that when a person goes to the original languages, they do so as to teach a false belief because they don't like what their English Bible says. It's as if they think they know more than the 47 translators on the KJB or something (who knew multiple languages).

You mean you want to hide behind some original language word you really don't know to teach something that is not true or what you want to be true?

Begotten or Begat or Beget is to give birth to. This is just what is in the dictionary and what we see when we read the Bible. John 1:18 says in some Modern Bibles that Jesus is the BEGOTTEN GOD. Meaning, they are saying that Jesus is a second created God. I have ran into these types before...