Search results

2 seeds = the seed of the father, and the seed of the slanderer.

That's the whole point. There are two distinct seeds that cannot live in the same house.

You are really on track. Consider this. The kingdom has not yet reached its fullness, so it cannot yet fully reign. The exercise of full sovereignty cannot happen until the temple, which has been under construction for nearly 2000 years, is completed, and the kingdoms of the world are then...

I was hoping that Groundzero would get back with us and explain why he used an Islamic website to argue his point of view?

When you view things as apostle Paul did, i.e., first the natural, then the spiritual (1 Corinthians 15:46), and consider the historical context in which a scripture was written, it becomes apparent that most (but not all) OT prophecies have been fulfilled. However, sometimes it just takes a...

Wow. What a complete waste of time your posts are; both for yourself and readers. Words multiplied endlessly that don't mean anything. As far as what interpretation method I use, it is that which apostle Paul set forth in his writings: first the natural, then the spiritual (1 Corinthians 15:46)...

It is eternally capable of removing sin, but it is only effective when applied through faith. The Hebrews in Egpyt through faith had to apply lamb's blood to their doorposts in order for their firstborns to be spared. The firstborn's of those who didn't exercise faith in that grace were...

Such a nonsensical comment. With this kind of reasoning you can make anything mean anything. And you do this with all of your exposition. You make things to mean whatever you say they mean contrary to the common sense of scripture and the witness of history, and other such witnesses. It's...

You just contradicted yourself. How can the 'smoke' of their torment rise forever and forever if they are gone forever?

You're either ignorant, or a troublemaker, trying to confuse the issue by polarizing the argument into futurism vs. full preterism. Full preterism is as much an abomination as futurism is. The truth lies in between these two excesses.

No, it really doesn't. Verses 1-2 describe events that occurred during the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD quite accurately. Verse 3 very likely goes with verses 1-2 because the text literally says in both the LXX and MT that YHWH will fight (deploy in the LXX) IN the nations, not against...

But if they reject that sacrifice, there is no sacrifice for their sins. They are removed and kept away from the congregation of God.

Acts 1:11 says nothing about where the messiah will return to. It only says that he will return in the same manner that he ascended, i.e., in clouds. Nor does it even say that he will return to the earth. All it says is that he will return in clouds, which is what Revelation corroborates. You...

I said verse numbers, not chapters. I'm not going to waste my time trying to ferret out what you're trying to say.

That right there describes my walk in Christ. Very profound.

1) Where in scripture is it predicted that the Messiah will descend to the land of Israel? 2) If the dead and alive in Christ meet him in the air, and "national Isra'el" is still on the ground to be rescued, obviously "national Isra'el" is not in Christ. Where in scripture does it say that those...

Per this belief, do these three persons each have their own body?

The one mentioned in Revelation 4:2 is not Jesus Christ, the son of man; but the father, the Ancient of Days. Notice that that one has no form of a person, but is merely described as color, i.e., jasper stone and sardius in appearance. Jesus Christ, the one who does have the from of a person...

That's a really good point.

Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would not have sin. But now because you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains. John 9:41