Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Ronald Nolette

    Adam and Eve Were Replacements for a Previous Couple Who Died

    YOu r lack of knowing Scripture is glaring. Adam did not physically die the day he ate. But as teh what was originally written shows, the process of physical death began. You have no biblical evidence that they died and rose again. Once someone dies- there is only their judgment! that is...
  2. Ronald Nolette

    Adam and Eve Were Replacements for a Previous Couple Who Died

    Well as you have changed it the most here so far, what point is it you are making? You have not shown how Adam and Eve were not the first humans created by God.
  3. Ronald Nolette

    210 democrats in house vote against keeping babies born alive alive after abortion failures

    I see the massive natural disasters and the collapse of so many businesses and banks as the hand of God bringing America down. whether or not the churches first and then the lost respond rightly remains to be seen.
  4. Ronald Nolette

    A response to the false doctrine of eternal conscious torment (ECT)

    And when death and teh grave are destroyed before humans are cast into that lake, there is no more death! Jesus defeated death for all mankind, so all are now immortal when resurrected. Spirits do not inhabit teh grave or death and death and teh grave gave up teh bodies that were in them. Why...
  5. Ronald Nolette

    Who are the sons of God and the daughters of men

    Yes moral corruption was the cause of destroying mankind. But simple primary grammar tells you the Nephilim and Gibborim and men of renown are the offspring of the relationships.
  6. Ronald Nolette

    Who are the sons of God and the daughters of men

    and both of these are interpretations. Interpreting is different from reading and accepting. God dwells in heaven! Since sin came no man can behold God and live. Even Moses, whom I assume you would call one of these "noble kings" could not look upon god! As for Satan being in heaven? 6...
  7. Ronald Nolette

    A response to the false doctrine of eternal conscious torment (ECT)

    Except when fire destroys death and the grave before people are cast into that fire! All lives are now immortal.
  8. Ronald Nolette

    Is the story of Noah literal?

    yes it is! hundreds laid down in days, wrong again. Basic hydroxyls are very safe! Matter of fact they make odor removal generators using hydroxyls. Well the super continent broke up after the flood so that part is moot. And how fast they moved is anybody's hypothesis. and 1/8th inch...
  9. Ronald Nolette

    The New Wine won't Fit.

    If only you did! I would not pity you as I do! And it seems you have focused more on the Kabbalistic training than the actual Word of God. YOu are stepped in covenantal reinterpretation of the Scriptures. and most of it does nothing to give you insight into the word of God. And based on the...
  10. Ronald Nolette

    Who are the sons of God and the daughters of men

    And you are reading "noble kings" into the text when it isn't there. And common caste women when it isn't there. Gen. 6 contrasts the "sons of god" as opposed to the "daughters of mankind" (not just a class of women). This union produced the Nephil, and the Gibbor. How would a union of a...
  11. Ronald Nolette

    Adam and Eve Were Replacements for a Previous Couple Who Died

    Well it is the accurate translation for the passage in question, if you bothered to look at the Hebrew. As for the other passages, we can look at them one by one and see if the construct in the language god inspired them in is the same construct as in gen. 2. the fact you pooh-poohed off the...
  12. Ronald Nolette

    Adam and Eve Were Replacements for a Previous Couple Who Died

    Well as you have clearly shown, you do not accept the literal reading. By saying Adam and Eve were replacements shows you reject teh Word as written.
  13. Ronald Nolette

    Adam and Eve Were Replacements for a Previous Couple Who Died

    I hate to break the news to you, but being an engineer and inventor does not give you insight into reinterpreting the Word of God. Gods Word is to be accepted and obeyed, not tinkered with to satisfy your whims. So because you think every one else may do it (you are guessing) you think that...
  14. Ronald Nolette

    Who are the sons of God and the daughters of men

    So human kings regularly travelled to heaven then according to you. Moses knew very well the word King and righteous king, why would he use a word to describe these entities that are mentioned only four other times in Job and clearly reference angels. Where is you revidence other than someone...
  15. Ronald Nolette

    Is the story of Noah literal?

    You need to read up on hydroxyls then. Also hydroxyls are found in the troposphere which is far far cooler than the temps you hypothesized are needed to create them. Hydroxyls are formed when the bond between O and H are broken, and that can happen when yo uboil water at 212 degrees. MOst...
  16. Ronald Nolette

    Is the story of Noah literal?

    And that is his supposition and he is entitled to his guesses.
  17. Ronald Nolette

    Is the story of Noah literal?

    You need to watch some recent videos of the effects MT. St. Helens left after it erupted and learn real facts for a change that can be tested and observed with the naked eye. And the tectonic plates are still in motion and continental drift is still taking place! and it is not hotter than the...
  18. Ronald Nolette

    The New Wine won't Fit.

    Yes it is and I rejoice in this verse. So you went from being a Presbyterian to a SBC person. Were you in their congregations or just listened to their broadcasts and read their books. And you think he never sinned but just taught others to confess theirs and grow in grace. Once again, you...
  19. Ronald Nolette

    A response to the false doctrine of eternal conscious torment (ECT)

    Wrong Wrong Wrong. If all the lost have to face is never ending non-existence for a life of pleasure in sin- that is not a tragic loss. It is not symbolic that suffering is eternal, it is real. The everlasting death is an everlasting conscious existence apart from God in torment of fire. Non...
  20. Ronald Nolette

    Is the story of Noah literal?

    Not as high as you are intimating. As water boils, the bonding between o and H are broken.