Search results

Addressing the OP, yes, the second resurrection is after the 1,000 years.

Joel 2:28 "And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: now the one who is "I" in Joel, Acts 2:33 "Therefore being by the right hand of God...

2 Corinthians 10:3 "For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: 2 Corinthians 10:4 "(For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) 2 Corinthians 10:5 "Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth...

anytime someone who cannot answer a straight question is in deception. so next

the bow there is not a weapon, nor in Rev 6:2, it is symbolic of the covenant. scripture, Genesis 9:13 "I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth". PICJAG

so I can take this as you don't know what the word of God say? is not the Holy Ghost your guide who teach us in all thing I'm very aware of 2 Peter 1:20, the discussion is about what the Holy Spirit has taught us. it should be the same thing.

dave make it clear, is it the one whom you call the son was sent by the Lord God and his spirit yes or no? it's simple if the Lord God and his spirit sent the Son or not. make it clear.....

ok clear up any assumption, is the Son sent by the Lord God and his spirit, yes or no?

well dave, still cannot answer? that's ok, you said, "And now the Lord GOD, and his Spirit [spoken of in the 3rd person using basic rules of grammar], sent me [again 1st person using basic rules of grammar] so the Son was sent by the Father, (the Lord God) and his Spirit is this correct?

before I answer are you speaking of the bow in Revelation 6:2?

well, see dave, I'm not as sharp as you...... so just make it plain for us who is not as acute as you, jusy put it in Laymans terms. Is this the same person in John 1:3 and Isaiah 44:24? a YES or a NO will do for us.

First thanks for your reply, second, I see you cannot answer the question which is a easy question to answer. You simply is saying, "I CANNOT answer", because it will destroy my doctrine of belief in the trinity. THIS IS EXACITY WHAT YOU’RE SAYING. See dave, the scripture are true, 2...

ERROR, The beginning here at John 1:1 is not Genesis 1:1, but there at John’s day, supportive scripture. 1 John 1:1 "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; 1 John 1:2...

you didn't answer the question, let me make it clear, is the person in John 1:3 the same person in Isaiah 44:24 yes or no?

is this the SAME person? yes or no

don't you talk to your self? ... :eek: but you have no idead as to what Diverity is all about. JUST LIKE IN gEN 1:26 WAS not God speaking to himself that was to come in flesh. (smile), dave I have to laugh, your wisdom is from below ..... :) now, what about that John 1:3 and ISAIAH 44:24...

First thanks for the reply, second, it's not an endless discussion, it's only endless to those who believe in it.Third, I have no belife of my own, but that which is of the Lord Jesus who is God. and that belief is that God, who is the ONLY person in the Godhead, who is JESUS, "diversified" his...

don't mean to butt in on your conversatation. this is an allegory, of being born naturally, and being born of the the spirit. natural women have children of the Flesh with husbands, now all the children are born of the Spirit. hence the saying, " for the desolate hath many more children than she...

First thanks for the reply. second, I'll answer you this way. this is not the Judgment of the people of God, but their enemies, which is opposite of the 4 judgments in Revelation 6 and Ezekiel 14. and yes, "And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord , that I will cut off thy horses...

(smile), and you too. :D PICJAG.