Search results

He did but that is okay. Jewish War 6.5.1 271-276 (PDF) Josephus and the Destruction of Jerusalem | Jonathan Price - Academia.edu The Fall of Jerusalem by Flavius Josephus, G.A. Williamson (Translator) 3.83 · Rating details · 83 ratings · 13 reviews Led by the mighty Titus, the...

Wow love does not keep accounts of wrong. god is love! So you have just done what God doesn't do! How does one spell hypocrite????? To me it seems this way----Robert Derrick. YOu have made yourself a god in the place of God! But I will continue to serve the One whose mercies are fresh and...

Well you just sinned by this comment- Welcome to the real world! Come down from Mount Olympus! You are just like all believers- not perfect- just forgiven, that is if you are even saved.

No I do believe the gospel is the power of God. As Paul also wrote- Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. But that has nothing to do with Free will or election. that just defines how an unsaved person gets the faith to believe. I continue to believe in the total depravity as...

Wow that false argument I thought died the painful death it deserves. YOu show your ignorance of Gods word. god did not "form" the animals from the dust- He spoke them into existence! Reread Genesis 1 without the Watchtower blinders and learn what God says for a change! Your last sentnece...

First, Paul wrote in Greek and for flesh used the word sarxx instead of soma (body or carcass as you called it) It is our nature. And Pauls writings were revolutionary in their day which is why it is hard to understand! It is not a license for anybody to go ahead and "discewrn" his real...

YOu can argue what you wish, but when you say what is written is not what is meant, you are saying this in a manner: " I know what teh Bible says, but here is what it really means." Why should we believe "your meaning" any more than the millions of others who have made their own opinion the...

Sorry Randy but you are wrong! Also you reject in measure the Scriptures for formulating systematic theology, but you have a systematic theology whether you call it that or not and you usewhat you think the writers meant - IOW you are redefining the words on teh page. If this sounds harsh, it...

This tells me you do not even have a clue who God is! God is perfectly just! He will not let one sin go unpunished. Nor does He wink at His children's sins while punishing the unbeliever! But what you do not know in your false doctrines is that Every one who is born again has already had...

thanks! I think I would like my fingernails being pulled out more! LOL

I gave y0ou the uses, now I will let you look up from a concordance or biblical dictionary of linguistic workbook of OT and NT books by language and discover for yourself. then maybe you will ber more apt to lisdten instead of wading in waters you are ignorant of.

Those straws are getting thinner and thinner. I did not say the office or rank was different but the language was different. do try to read my posts while you are awake and stop twisting my words. But to play along with your foolishness. as far as rank- there may or may not be a difference...

Boy you really8 are grasping at straws. If you do not understand how to use rules of grammar and languagfe dictionaries- you are a pseudo- biblical student. So You think the writers of King James were as infallible as the original writers of SCripture? IOW are you a king James only person?

Yep I even posted that as well! But that is the fourth definition. You do know that Strongs wirte things in the order of import and that the first is to be used unless compelled by grammar not to. But like I told you, outside of the translators in english oif the Bible way back when- Archon...

They were not part of the entrire list. but nice dodge in not even mentionjikng that the vast majority of English and foreign translations use ruler instead of prince there. But that is beside the point. I recognize Jesus is called prince as I called HIm that in the first Prince in Daniel 9...

So you do not believe that Messiah teh Prince in Daniel 9 is Jesus?? Wow! See I quopte it and then allow History to identify who the prophet referred to. Sorry about what you do. Every church I know of, recognizes through their "arbitrary substitutions", that Messiah the prince can only be...

Sorry big bad wolf! but your you can never sin again and be saved is a concrete ship!

Even James said anything apapret from faith is sin! So even mans "good deeds" are poisoned by his sin nature. Paukl went on in Corinthians to say the natural man (unsaved) does not even perceive the things of God for they are foolish to HIm. I am not one who easily redefines passages of...

Yes. If the founders were alive today, they may bvery well think we have a four year king everytime and call for another revolution. America today barely is constitutional and people are content as long as federal sugar daddy gives them their lollipops.