Search results

both sides of the aisle love to manipoulate the numbers to thewir advantage- that is called politics in todays corrup[t America!

The bible does not say it is a one tiume totsal gathering, but a calling back to teh land. and it has been happening since 1948. whether the pace will pick upi the closer we get to the rapute- we will have to wait and see.

Thus ends this lost cause!

Thius ends this useless conversation.

It was you who wrote that tongues was not a gift! I have no prejudice against you. that is you making presumptions that are wrong. From your OP: It may come as somewhat of a surprise to most Christians to learn that the scriptures never call tongues a gift. In every English and Greek version...

All depends on how you want to tdefine the resurrection. If it is simply someone rising from the dead- No Jesus wasn't. OT poeople were risen from teh dead, Lazarus was risen from the dead, widows son of Naim was risen etc. 2. If you mean risen never to die again? Yes Jesus is the first. 3...

I am not asking you to please the world. Iam severely disabled. I have chronic, severe and widespread arthritis. I have four heart conditions and male lupus that makes me extremely light and heat sensitive. I need a cane to get a round and at times that barely doesa it. What I am asking you...

Jesus was not even the first to be resurrected from teh dead. He is the firstfuits of the resurrection. Meaning the first to physically rise glorified never to die! But REv. 20 is the first resurrection of people en masse at the onset of the millenial kingdom. If Jesus was the first...

I see it the way Scripture does. It is a manifestation ( or visible outworking of the inner spierit) and it is a gift. We have rfeached an end herew. Have the last word if you wish. There is only one way to see scripture-- as it is written. why you refuse to see Paul calling it a...

Sounds like a total dominion or kingdom now church.

Same difference. but it is good to see you are more concerned with my "misquote" than your misinterpretation of the passage. We have reached a dead end. Go to someone who teaches English grammar and ask them and see your covenantal redefining is wrong. Have the last word if you wish. I hope...

Really? are you going to strain at that gnat? Tongues is a manifestation! Meaning it is visible! tongues is a gift- given by the Spirit as He wishes to whom He wishes. that makes it a manifested gift! Do you really not understand that or are you being obtuse?

I couldn't answer. teh bible did not take a census of all those things. but I expect some of them are euphemistic. But it does not mean that every tinme a trhousand is used it must be symbolic. And if we are to rightly divide the word- every timne1,000 is symbolic it has to equal the same...

1. , 2, 3 4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their...

That there is only one prince is your covenant confusions showing forward. I do have to teach people here basic grammar because it seems covenant believers have forsaken basic rules of grammar when it comes to reading and understanding Scripture but let us look one more time and hopefully your...

And you make yourself a hypocrite by withholding your gift from a local church and judging the other saints who like you, are less than perfect! YOu don't like their weaknesses? Love them! Jesus died for them and loves them just as much as you! and who knows what the spirit is doing in their...

Are you really that bereft of basic grammatic knowledge or are you purposely playing stupid? The modifier is the description afterwards ! Even HIM, whose coming is after the working of Satan, with..... the phrase in commas . This is known as an attributive tag and modifies and identifies...

Well I never have had anyone call me thin skinned! LOL Walrus hide? Sure but thin skinned never. I use sarcasm as a foil of humor, but also to help people look at what they are doing as well or writing. Well as I did not start with a jibe at you that is irrelavent. I started by posting the...

Well it is where we disagree. You think 1,000 years is not 1,000 years. You do not believe in a resurrection after jesus returns, followed by another resurrection 1,000 years later. but on this point, no matter what you think the 1,000 years stands for, there is a resurrection before it and...

"Sigh" :oops: be awake this time and pay attention. This is a totally fdifferent construct than Daniel. Whose coming is after teh working of Satan is the modifier for him!