Search results

Scripture does not teach a mysterious church age which began after Acts and was only revealed through Paul’s letters during his imprisonment. Jesus commissioned His church before Paul was even a Christian ~Matthew 16:18. Luke refers to “the church” over and over BEFORE Paul’s prison epistles...

Galatians 2 does not help your case. It destroys it. Galatians 2 is not two churches. It is one gospel being defended against corruption. Paul says the issue was that false brethren were trying to bring believers into bondage ~Galatians 2:4. He does not say there were two bodies. He says there...

Your questions were already answered in this post, from the very verses you keep circling. John 10:16 does not say “scattered Jews outside Jerusalem.” It says “other sheep… not of this fold,” and the result is “one fold, and one shepherd” ~John 10:16. You are adding a limitation the text never...

This has already been explained, plainly and from Scripture. I already showed that Luke calls it “the church” before Paul’s ministry unfolds ~Acts 9:31, that Jesus promised one church before Paul was converted ~Matthew 16:18, and that Luke presents Acts 11 as expansion, not replacement ~Acts...

I’m not interested in chasing labels. If your view of “binding” is different than what I described, then state it from the text. The issue is not what amils call it. The issue is what John wrote. John does not describe a partial restraint. He describes an angel laying hold of Satan, binding...

You are arguing against a position I am not taking. Revelation 20:3 is future, not present. I am not treating it as something happening now. I am using it to show why it cannot be happening now. John describes a condition that will exist when Satan is bound, that he “should deceive the nations...

Revelation 20 is future, not now. Scripture does not place Satan’s binding at the cross or at Pentecost. John is explicit. Satan is bound, sealed in the abyss, and prevented from deceiving the nations, then later released to deceive them again ~Revelation 20:1–8. That sequence has never...

There is a difference between asking a question and using a question to overturn the text. Scripture already answers the issue. Satan is bound “that he should deceive the nations no more” ~Revelation 20:3. The nations are still deceived ~1 John 5:19. Satan still blinds minds ~2 Corinthians 4:4...

Here you go again with the same false teachings, but a new thread. Please stop it with your false teachings. You are forcing Scripture to say what it never says. There is no verse anywhere that teaches two churches running side by side. Not one. What you call the “little flock” is what Jesus...

I have no issue with honest questions. Scripture invites them. “Come now, and let us reason together” ~Isaiah 1:18. What I am pushing back on is not curiosity, but conclusions that go beyond what is written. There is a difference between asking what Scripture says and reshaping Scripture to...

You are just trying to push a falsehood that it is consistently taught by amillennial, postmillennial, and preterist teachers who refuse to let Revelation say what it says.

The Bible does not ask us to speculate about the chain. It tells us why it exists. Satan is bound “that he should deceive the nations no more” ~Revelation 20:3. That condition has never existed yet. Right now the nations are deceived ~1 John 5:19. Satan still blinds minds ~2 Corinthians 4:4. He...

@Doug, this is where your argument finally shows its hand. You are no longer arguing about verses. You are arguing that unity in Christ did not exist until Paul, and that everything before him operated under a different church. Scripture does not allow that. Paul never says the body of Christ...

@GRACE ambassador, here is the truth, plain and Scripture-first. You keep saying “rightly divided” like it is a master key that lets you lock parts of Jesus’ words in a back room. But “right division” is not permission to divide Christ, divide His commands, or divide His people. Paul said...

Be cautious of those who identify as Christians but whose beliefs stem from personal opinions and emotions rather than the teachings of God's word.

@Doug, the problem is not that Scripture creates two churches. The problem is that you are forcing a false dilemma by refusing to distinguish audience, timing, and purpose while still affirming one body. Scripture does that without inventing parallel churches. First, Acts 15 does not show two...

You’re not asking honest questions. You’re stacking verses, ripping them from their context, and jamming them together to force a conclusion. That’s not dividing Scripture rightly. That’s twisting it. Jesus told the apostles to go and teach everything He commanded to all nations ~Matthew...

What you teach is false teaching. Jesus Christ is supreme. Period. “And he is the head of the body, the church… that in all things he might have the preeminence” ~Colossians 1:18. There is only one Head. If you give headship to Peter over some church and Paul over another church, you have...

~Ephesians 4:4–5 “There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism” ~Ephesians 2:14–16 “For he is our peace, who hath made both one… to make in himself of twain one new man… that he might reconcile both unto God in one body...

This is the same error again. You are twisting Scripture to preserve a division God says He has already removed. You keep lifting Israel language out of context and forcing it to exclude believing Gentiles, even though Scripture says Christ “hath made both one” ~Ephesians 2:14 and that there is...