Search results

Science is all about making predictions. Once those predictions are found to be wrong then it should mean that the theory or hypothesis is dead. In the 90s they said sea levels would rise. They got it wrong yet people keep believing their nonsensical pseudo-science

Yea well I had an extended debate with someone on another thread who was making it seem like I was doing something wrong. Wouldn't answer any of my questions and just kept repeating his favourite bible verses while rejecting the ones I provided. Eventually he admitted there is nothing wrong with...

In other parts of the world it's getting colder. The overall global temperature has not changed much at all over the last few decades and Antarctica is not melting but getting bigger with more ice, as has been shown to be the case already on this thread. In the 90s they said that sea levels...

I have faith and I choose to follow Christ's footsteps and live a life with good deeds and repent for my sins. Some people don't like hearing that and act as if I'm doing something wrong or bad. I don't understand that. If you believe that only faith saves you then I will be saved. I believe...

WATERMELONS GREEN ON THE OUTSIDE RED IN THE MIDDLE :Laughingoutloud: :jest::Laughingoutloud::jest::Laughingoutloud::jest::Laughingoutloud::jest:

@Wrangler A while ago I saw someone on the internet giving a talk about the global warming hoax. He had two graphs, one of Co2 levels and one of temperature levels over time. When he put one over the other it showed that rise in Co2 occurred after the rise in temps. Have you seen that? So if...

There probably is no literature that cites the alarmist claims of Greta. What I said is that media, governments, scientists, united nations and such, actually consulted her on the topic. Do you at least admit that was wrong?

Actually, governments, media, united nations, scientists and such did consult her. That the most hilarious thing about it. And people who criticised her claims were being ostracised.

You love her

He has an issue with dishonesty. With me he became a repeated liar. That's why I stopped engaging him. To be honest I started to wonder if he was an AI robot, on this forum to put doubts into people's minds about God.

I was joking, imitating the hysterical alarmists that were saying all this crazy stuff about the end if the world

@Wrangler @The Barbarian The world is going to end in 4 years and your still driving around in a car... HOW DARE YOU :Laughingoutloud: :jest: :Laughingoutloud: :jest::Laughingoutloud::jest:

I will be saved That's all that matters to me

Mr pseudo-science you are being destroyed once again, this time by someone else and I'm enjoying it

On this post alone you have well and truly refuted global warming or climate change or whatever they want to call it. Good work

Then it's settled. I will keep up my good deeds

You don't answer my questions so why bother. There is nothing wrong with having good deeds. It's better than having bad deeds

That is one of the main red flags of pseudo-science. Here are the red flags I see in the climate change narrative that makes it a pseudo-science 1- Claim of infallibility. "The science is settled" Saying that is claiming infallibility, it tells everyone that it cannot be opposed. This goes...

Hahaha you just love pseudo-science. LoL that's all you ever talk about. Hehehe :jest: :Laughingoutloud: