Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Your claim is completely false. By the time of the Reformation, the Reformers had recognized the Roman papacy to be the predominant antichrist of their era. They recognized its characteristics in Daniel 7:8,20,21,24,25; and that it would continue beyond their era, to the end (Daniel...
  2. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    There's no reason to believe it was the end. None whatever.
  3. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    It lines up perfectly with fulfilled history, same as the other two Gospel accounts. The flight of the Judaean Christians. There's no lining up better than that.
  4. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Does someone or something solve something?
  5. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Luke 21:21 is fulfilled history. No amount of desperate denial can change that.
  6. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Amen bro.
  7. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Provide a link to your source for this nonsense. :laughing: You said previously that the Judaean Christians had fled circa 70 AD, which means Luke 21:21 is history. So you've changed your mind?
  8. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Are you finished your whining? I'm not responsible for your inability to comprehend Scripture and English. And having an opinion which differs from yours, and is grounded in historical orthodox Christianity, is not blatant, underhanded, lie, etc, So peddle your faux sanctimony somewhere else...
  9. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Yes, a blatant manifestation of nothing other than the worship of antichrist. I'm long convinced that there is a special compartment in hell reserved for dispensatanism. Because it has the Word, but insists on contorting it into an abomination of desecration. It will experience the same fate...
  10. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Matthew 24 and Luke 21 both refer to Christ warning, and to the Judaean Christians fleeing. And history confirms that they fled. So the only way that Matthew 24 and Luke 21 are not the same is by futurized fantasy and fallacy. No other way. Posttribbers have the witness of both Scripture...
  11. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Dispens care about nothing but their own abominable desecrations of Scripture. They elevate and worship talmudic antichrists above Christ Himself. They contort God into a racist. Dispens ally themselves with the talmudic antichrists of that day, and of this day. They are gladly welcomed...
  12. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Did the Judaean Christians flee?
  13. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Your appeal to the blasphemous talmud is telling. Jesus denounced it and the antichrist pharisees who promulgated it: Matthew 15 6 ...Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. 9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men...
  14. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Two questions. Too difficult. Too bad. :laughing:
  15. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Citing inspired Scripture is a waste of sentences? What other wisdom do you have for us today? :laughing:
  16. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Are you claiming that Luke 21:20 was not the words of Jesus in the Olivet Discourse? Does your gnosis preclude that? Stop twisting and attempting to deny inspired Scripture. Neither Luke 21:20 nor I says or said anything whatever about the temple specifically. That's your imagination again...
  17. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    According to history it was Christians who fled, which would have included both Christian Jews and Christian Gentiles. No mention of non-Christian Jews, who probably either didn't hear Jesus' warning, or didn't believe it. Only worthy ones, i.e. Christians, acted on the warning.
  18. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    :laughing: I've twisted nothing. The evidence confirms. The twisting is yours. :laughing:
  19. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    That's good to see. That's good to see.
  20. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Here's a joke. Matthew 21:12 And Jesus went into the saints of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the saints, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And this. John 5:14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the saints, and said unto him...
View older results
Top Bottom