Search results

Your video clip is created by Liberal Michael Popok, the very guy who campaigned for the very liberal NY democrat Laura Dunn (NY-12), a Biden Admin servant Video Source: Liberal Trump Hater (Michael Popok)

Straw Man, And False Claims

Straw Man Again Reformed Preterist Historicism teaches 70AD fulfillment of many things in scripture, yes the present teachings follow the Roman Catholic Jesuit Luis Del Alcasar

There are "Many" church fellowships that find their lineage "Outside" of Martin Luther's works in reformation, I attend one of those many fellowships

Father of Reformed Preterism, A Roman Catholic Jesuit Theologian Luis del Alcázar (Ludovicus ab Alcasar, Louis of Alcazar) (1554–1613) was a Spanish Jesuit theologian. Title page from the Vestigatio of Luis del Alcázar (1614).

Yes the reformed churches are still carrying Roman Catholic baggage, and infant baptism is just one of them Jesus Is The Lord

Straw Man There are many God fearing men that got a few things wrong, and the reformers are prime examples, Infant Baptism is just another honorable mention

100% "False" Daniel 9:25 (Messiah The Prince) who is (Jesus Christ) has absolutely "ZERO" reference to Daniel 9:26 and (the prince that shall come) who will be Daniel's (Little Horn) Paul's (Man Of Sin) John's (The Beast) Jesus Is The Lord

Thanks for your lengthy response, but I disagree I have covered my opinion several times regarding Ezekiel 39 being a war fought long ago with wooden weapons, and how the Lord brought Israel back to Jerusalem from the Babylonian Captivity and the 2nd Zerubabbel temple was built all expenses...

Rome nor the Papacy has played any part in fulfillment of Daniel 7:8, you project the standard reformed eschatology in Rome and the Pope(s) being fulfillment

Thanks for your time Jesus Is The Lord

I Disagree, it was a battle surrounding Israel's return after the Babylonian captivity, it was fought with wooden weapons of warfare, bows, arrows, spears, and shields Israel was under the rulership of the decree of Cyrus the great and his son Darius the king of persia 70AD played no part in...

It appears you Follow the standard reformed teachings, Antioch Epiphanies and the 33AD cross of Calvary, I Disagree I clearly responded on my belief, Daniel's (Little Horn) is the very same future human man who will be present on earth until the Lord's second coming in the consummation (The...

Many posters on this board claim that (The Beast) and (The Two Witnesses) are on this earth at separate time periods with (The Two Witnesses) coming first for 3.5 years, then (The Beast) follows them with a time of 3.5 years for a total of 7 years? The scripture above clearly teaches that (The...

Sounds like the standard reformed teaching that the RCC and the Popes have been a continous fulfillment? The scripture below teaches that (The Little Horn) will be present on this earth in a physical body that will be destroyed at the Lord's second coming in final judgement (The Books Were...

Answered In Post #324 Above

(EVEN UNTIL THE CONSUMMATION) "Daniel's AOD Is Future" and the bad guy causing the Abomination and Desolation will be present on earth to the "Consummation" The Ultimate End "Future" Events Unfulfilled Matthew 24:15KJV 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by...

Sorry (The prince to come) is Daniel's (Little Horn) who will be a future literal human man, that will be present on this earth at the Lord's future second coming as you've been clearly shown Jesus Is The Lord

I Disagree The future fake temple with animal sacrifice resumed is clearly seen in Isaiah 66:1-4, God calls it an abomination

Scripture interprets itself before your eyes, will you deny God's words of truth? Daniel 9:26-27 (the prince that shall come) is Daniel's (Little Horn) "He" will destroy the temple/sanctuary and stop the daily sacrifice as seen in Daniel 8:9-11 Conclusion: The "He" in Daniel 9:27 is (The...