Search results

Hello again just seeing if you saw post #43 but no rush if your busy, just wondering if you have seen this view before.

Thanks but that’s not how I see it. I see the little horn as Antiochus Epehanies and the fourth empire as Greece not Rome. If the rock (the kingdom of God) didn’t strike the statue until Christ first came, then how could the rock destroy all four kingdoms with one strike when three of those...

Thank you for those kind words and prayers. I believe that Antiochus Epiphanes was the little horn

Okay thanks and no I don't mind I do see the little horn differently than you do though

Well we do have very different views on this but first to start off, the bible does not state that the 4 horsemen go out against the church.

Hello CTK, any comment on post #3?

I believe that the four horsemen representEd the events in the Roman Jewish war leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in the first century. God sent these spirts from heaven from Zechariah chapter 6 to judge apostate Israel The six seals in revelation chapter six line up with the events...

Yes they are

Hello brother, I see the beast as a demonic being influencing Greece and it’s leaders mainly Antiochus Epehanies in the book of Daniel This beast was slain when Greece was defeated by the Roman empire Yes this beast is the fourth kingdom in chapter two Do you mean chapter two or chapter four?

I also believe that they would be but Rev 19 doesn't specify who the ones in white are I believe that the ones in white are the saints but the angels would also be present. We are in agreement on what the New Jerusalem is.

Yes they would include the saints but were you including the angles in chapter 19? I didn't think you were because you never stated that in chapter 19. So for clarification what is "the great city" mentioned in chapter 11? Ezekiel chapter 16 shows that Jerusalem was unfaithful lusting...

Yes, but there are different things in those verses like this verse shows Jesus coming with His angels not the saints and with blazing fire not the sword of His mouth so obviously not the same one-time event. Yes, Jesus died just outside of the walls of Jerusalem but that was still considered...

But it also doesn't say that they do leave heaven so that is also an argument from silence from you. I still see it from all time including the end of our world but at the end of our world is by fire which is different from this text. That parable doesn't support your view, in that parable the...

Yes they were saved by grace through faith of a future coming messiah and saviour

Yes I'm not disagreeing with that but the fact is that Christ still had to die to pay for our sins and the verses I posted proves my point. Revelation 12 5 She gave birth to a son, a male child, who “will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.”[a] And her child was snatched up to God and to...

Yes they were saved by their faith in a future Messiah and savior, but they were saved by the blood of the Lamb, Jesus had to die and rise. The verse that I provided in my last post to you proves it

Revelation 12 5 She gave birth to a son, a male child, who “will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.”[a] And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne. 7 6 The woman fled into the wilderness to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days...

Thanks, but I don't see 70AD as a complete fulfillment I see the cross and resurrection as the full spiritual fulfillment of Christ victory. I do believe that the events of 70AD are a part of revelation but not the entire spiritual fulfillment

Paragraph 1-Yes we do agree on a lot thanks Paragraph 2-Yes I was saying the same thing all of Jesus enemies from the first advent till the end of our world but what about the point that Jesus threatened to come and destroy the ones mentioned in Revelation 2:16? Revelation 2:16 16 Repent...

Missiles and bullets the text shows them on horseback obviously its not literal and the text mentions nothing about the armies firing back