Search results

Well if you are a literalist then why did you acknowledge with bingo (normally a word used to denote correctness) when I asked if you were a preterist and allegorist? Preterism in and of itself requires a massive allegorical eschatology.

Secular science itself has many preposterous assumptions. No where does the Bible say that angels, when leaving heaven and taking on human form could not have sex. The only time it is mentioned is when Jesus said in heaven people will be like the angels. This is ambiguous for it can mean...

And there in lies you problem Mormons, Jw's, many cults and lany sects of Christendom are also allegorists and either partial or full preterists. They get their info from as you also claim to and you all disagree with one another. And to be a preterist you have to do massive reinterpretation of...

Church history also proves you wrong! It wasn't until the mid 20th Century that women stopped wearing physical coverings on their heads. Even the protestant women went to service with head coverings

Your error is that you have a predisposed bias of who the sons of God are. IN the OT the term bene Elohim appears only 4 times. three in job where it is only angels and here where a proper exegesis and correct hermeneutic as well as consistent language requires it to be angels. It also...

No it is not just the hair. It is a physical covering like a hat. That is what the language says. If it is spiritual you have a real problem with men- for they are to have their heads uncovered. But it says the head of the man is Jesus, so according to your logic men are not to have Jesus as...

So are you saying you have completely and absolutely forsaken every thing of the world in thought, word and deed? If not you do not belong to Jesus according to your claims. but the Bible says different. When one is saved, they are saved forever. Teh bible is clear and unambiguous on this...

HIstory and common practice prove your hypothesis wrong. Also in this samne passage Paul uses the word cover to mean a physical head covering. The Word is akatakalyptos and means without a covering or veil. All married women went to worship with some type of physical covering on their heads...

All sin is mortal. The Catholic concept of mortal versus venial sin is unbiblical. Once again sin is not the issue. When one accepts Jesus as Savior and Lord, they have become a new Creature. The old one ( the old man who was condemned) and we have become the children of God. All of our...

The purpose of all correction is reconciliation. we are tpo do it in love! yes , sometimes it must be harsh, but that is always the last resort.

Well your error is that you have pulled single verses out of context and used them improperly. Grace does not equal salvation. Grace is the outpouring of Gods love to both saved and unsaved! But verses that confirm we have eternal salvation now: 1Jo 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God...

Sorry but this is incorrect. A woman must have a spiritual authority over her. For a married woman this is her husband, for an unmarried young girl, this is her father. But this chapter is specifically dealing with head coverings in worship. A married woman in teh congregation should have a...

Well I agree that thye written Word leads us to the living Word. But Scripture is the final authority for man concerning doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction so that we may fully equipped unto all good works. all other revealed revelations, whether by written word, visions...

WEll most of your post has nothing to do with what I wrote on. It is a little too harsh. Someone wanted to know about eternal salvation and I told them. There is a time and place for hellfire and brimstone preaching, but this was neither the time nor the place brother.

I am not understanding what you are trying to say here.

Sorry but the language of the originals show we have eternal salvation now! There isnothing in this universe that can now separate us frfom the love of God in Christ. Sin is no longer the issue. Jesus paid the price for all sin. If a person dies and goes to the lake of fire, it is not...

I see it differently. god does not make mistakes neither did He allow those He chose to write His inspired word to make mistakes. When numbers are used metaphorically or to denote a different time span, history or the context bears it out. Unless we are compelled y the word itself we should...

I appreciate your answer. The sealing is a present work as Paul declared and then added UNTIL which is a future act. If it has happened then this passage becomes irrelavewnt to a believer.

I appreciate your sentiment that you are not attacking my faith, for I am not trying to attack yours. I absolutely agree we live in the spiritual kingdom now. but when Jesus returns, He does set up a physical kingdom that lasts 1000 years. This is what the Bible says in its words as inspired...

One should not interpret the days as years always. that is bad exegesis and a misunderstanding of what was actually said . the 490 of Daniel was 70 sevens. We now know there at that passage a day = a year, but that does not make every day in prophetic passages = a year that is bad exegesis...