Search results

What you are doing is taking one scripture and contradicting another. You cannot understand the Scriptures unless all verses on eternal are studied. John said we have eternal life by continuing to believe. Titus said we hope for it Peter said it is hoped for. Do you think unbelievers have...

John gives the condition for those who have eternal life. Those who CONTINUE to believe in Jesus. Therefore by putting all the Scriptures together on the subject of eternal life the right conclusion is, It is future because it is hoped for. It is conditional because of faith. It is a...

No, without the word of God I would not know what to respond to. If a hindu or Muslim taught me I could respond. But it would do me no good. If a preacher preached the gospel to me I could respond. Its God given free will. Since you dont believe God gives the ability to believe the gospel when...

I'm expecting a new pistol. If I dont have some unexpected expenses, I hope I'll have it by the end of this month. Do we hope for things already obtained? 1Peter 1:3, - blessed by the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ which according to His abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a...

Good morning RedFan!!!! That's not the point I was making. I dont believe the word translated in Aramaic is false no more than the word translated in English makes it false. The point is God preserved the new testament in Greek manuscripts. Therefore God APPROVES of Matthew 16:18-19, read...

You are making stuff up. Nowhere in Scripture does it teach Jesus spoke to Peter in Aramaic. The real evidence is the earliest manuscripts we do have of Matthew are written in greek. You most certainly did, You are the liar, Next you have admitted without realizing you deny the manuscripts...

It should be noted Peter NEVER referred to himself as the Head or chief apostle. But the Bible does clearly teach who the chief, head Apostle is, Hebrews 3:1, - Wherefore holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling consider the APOSTLE AND HIGH PRIEST of our profession, Christ Jesus...

Ok, I don't want to misrepresent you or Jude Thaddeus. Do you agree with my statement that you believe Peter is the chief apostle?

Good, I love it when you quote Scripture. I can respect that you tried to use Bible to prove Bible. Now I want it straight from you and Redfan since he claims Peter was over the other apostles. Simple question is Peter chief of the apostles? I need to know if this is what you believe by...

Where's your concrete evidence? This is more assumption

No friend, it is a sin to assume Peter was the leader of the apostles. You don't come to truth by assumption. Psalm 19:13, - keep back your servant also from presumptuous sins let them not have dominion over me Then shall I be innocent of great transgression Now you are in the same boat with...

I'm waiting for just one passage. Are you going to give one?

That passage really helps with the Catholics claiming Peter was chief, leader of the apostles, Thanks

Just keep making stuff up

You gotta be kidding? I sleep, eat and breath Scripture. You cannot give one BIBLE PASSAGE that Peter is the leader, chief, Head of the apostles? Like I said until you produce the passage it's all catholic fiction

Give me a passge

Baptizing babies proves catholics teach a false gospel not found in the new testament. You cannot give one Bible passage that teaches apostles baptized babies.

Give historical evidence outside of catholic sources of a pope pre-dating Boniface lll

No Scripture you just claim it. It's all catholic fiction

I believe Paul is referring to the gospel as the traditions, when he is speaking to the Thessalonians. Its Paul telling them to follow the traditions they received from him. That would be no different than what Peter taught the earliest christians in Acts 2:42. All the apostles = the traditions...