Search results

I must have missed that. We agree on the conclusion. Praise be. joy:

You apologized over a mere matter of fact while holding onto an error in reasoning. If you don’t realize that you’re doing that, I feel sorry for you. I suggest you re-read what was already written on the matter.

My pick is Wilt Chamberlain. He had a compelling argument against Jordan, saying when they change the rules of the game to counter Jordan's dominance, then we'll talk. Goal tending and other rules were devised to diminish Wilt's dominance. And there was no 3-point line when he played. Jack &...

The origins of the Crusades was a call by the Pope. From that speech, I'm sure the mobilization of forces took time and were centered in many places. The Templars are one group among many. Yes, when they say they are a religion of peace, that is in their world view that Islam is a house of...

You apologize for the smaller error while holding fast to the bigger error; the lack of evidence is not evidence. Supposing so is an error in reasoning of a type that is so well known since ancient times, it has a name, Appeal to Ignorance. Why do you hold on to this error in reasoning?

Who God is, is a warrior.Ex 15:3 NLT The LORD is a warrior; Yahweh is his name! REV Yahweh is a man of war; Yahweh is his name.

Logic is a powerful ally. Unlike morality, logic doesn’t require context, only the absence of word play. For instance, saying ”Tyson is the baddest boxer on the planet” means the opposite; he’s the best. Some suppose God operates outside of logic so doctrine can be ‘supported.’ That is...

Being overly-spiritualized, they suppose He didn’t mean it. He meant something metaphorical, not literal.

An Appeal to Ignorance, treating the lack of evidence as evidence.

Don’t have eyes to see. I didn’t invent a verse in Acts.

Although you didn't cite the source, that statistic matches my experience. Another good statistic. I forget the source but someone analyzed IQ of men and women and found a similar conclusion to driving. While the average is about the same, women are more consistently in the middle. Variation...

Your question is invalid because one thing doesn't cancel the other thing. Science answers the question HOW; religion answers the question WHY. See Psalm 19.

You don't have eyes to see. Beautifully expressed. The overly spiritualized live their faith AS IF non-violence is the end but the rest of the story from Christ's 2nd Coming is violently imposing justice, ruling with an iron rod and annihilating's even believers in the Lake of Fire, the 2nd...

Not a very Bible believing thing to write, is it? One fatal flaw the Creation Museum pointed out is the assumption with LONG TIME that rates observed today are used to extrapolate into the past. Could be dramatically different rates in the past. Historical science v observational science.

Evil is ascendant via globalism & suicidal birth rates.

A teaching not found on Tuesday (or in Acts) doesn't mean there is not a teaching to be found in the whole body of God's word.

Yup. That’s my point about Acts. @Anchorite keeps bringing up what it does NOT say as if that should be compelling. He’s committing the fallacy of Appeal to Ignorance, using the absence of evidence as evidence. I did the same thing to show the fallacy.

This is what happens when a government turns against its own people.

No typo. My post remains correct. v24 doesn't say they used weapons on a Tuesday. The absence of that is compelling, isn't? :Broadly:

I've been a fan of Novak throughout his career. No doubt, the GOAT. Growing up, I followed John McEnroe. My first match that I ever watched was the 4th set at Wimbledon against Bjorn Borg. I think the final game game was 23-21. I grow up with Agassi and Pete Sampras, who is my all-time favorite...