Search results

What is wrong with you to demand any portrayal of Jesus cannot for a moment show a lighter side of a character, one with a relatable sense of humor?

The opposite is true; he told us to buy a sword. You think that was to collect dust?

Yes. And you have contemptuously referenced it numerous times in Peter cutting off the ear of a guard.

Higher energy prices, more deaths, lower economic development and more poverty. Because communists don't understand economics, they don't grasp that artificially forcing investment from higher return to lower return assets causes poverty at the margin and lowers wealth in general. Imagine if...

He's just being divisive. Can' stand to concede a point that doesn't support the hysteria. Sure, you are 100% right but the trend is that one day it might be possible that you could be wrong. Yet, he doesn't apply such humility to his own claims. Imagine that?

Discernment and being able to detect patterns is a sign of intelligence that not all people possess. For instance, not all verses in Scripture are relevant to a particular moral point. I attempted to use verses with rocks compared to verses that don't mention rocks to establish a foundation upon...

Out of the Twilight Zone: Judge praises behavior of gang rapists, sentences them to 'rehabilitation'

No. Nowadays the more done in public, the better. The only caveat, don’t publicly pray for your own glory.

Not an answer to my question. Welcome to my ignore list.

Because it stems from soulful needs that Jesus addresses, not denies.

So much of what you post is exposition and commentary with no context outside your own opinions. Why in your very humble opinion do you say spiritual being different from soulful is nonsense?

I’ve literal,y answered this question dozens of times. See the dichotomy between spiritual and soulful verses. Let’s only talk about verses that don’t mention rocks to support the conclusion that Scripture doesn’t talk about rocks. Genius!

@Justified, here is another soulful verse, not to support defending oneself, but soulful, nonetheless: if you do not work, you shall not eat. This is not referring to spiritual work but work to sustain one’s body, not spiritual food but actual, physical, carnal food.

Your error, which you childishly try to cover by up by switching the verses that show your error. Sure, if you only consider spiritual verses, you embrace over-spritualized. That’s why you have to keep ignoring the soulful verses, such as buy a sword, give to Caesar what is Caesar's and God's...

Let‘s agree to disagree agreeably. No. It’s the proper interpretation. Who else can match Jesus raising people from the dead from all time for th3 purpose of killing them a 2nd time? Not false. You can’t even admit that Jesus didn’t cook spiritual fish but actual, physical, carnal fish on the...

I recall some European pseudo scientist said even if everything we believe about global warming is not true, we should still proceed AS IF it is true in going away from fossil fuels as a new central organizing principle.

Yea, a fair and balanced way to categorize the most successful military victory in human history.

Cheering for American defeat. Cheering for evil.

Since you, a Canadian, started a thread about American politics.