Search results

You are maligning me. I'm saying the KJV was not a new translation when 80% of it was plagiarised from Tyndale. Oz

I do not know of any majot doctrine affected by the dynamic equivalence of CEV, ERV, GNB, NIRV, NIV, REB. Dynamic equivalence is used by SIL translators who start from scratch when there is no written language in a new linguist group. Oz

Which church of Christ? The Churches of Christ in Australia? The Church of Christ USA? How would I find this church of Christ in Brisbane?

Do you understand the problems with plagiarism?

I read, translate & have taught NT Greek. Do you understand how many extra words are added to an alleged literal translation for it to make sense in English? Compare extra words added in an Interlinear translation to see added words. Mounce's Interlinear is available online. Oz

"Serious questions with many of them " again is a useless statement when you give zero.examples. I'll leave it to you to develop the criteria. Seems to me you are stuck in the rut of " resemblance to older translations " - - your criterion Then add to that your lack of appreciation for...

That doesn't alter the fact 80% of KJV did not come from KJV translators. It has nothing to do with Tyndale's martytdom but everything to do with the approach of the KJV translators - stealing 80% from an earlier version. Oz

Dr Gooogle may help you.

Thank you, i sincerely accept your apologies. Oz

That is a nasty flaming statement

Please prove that sweepikng ststrment to us.

I would call it.plagiarism when 80% of a translation - is copied by KJ V translators. Oz

Amen, Been in hospital for kidney failure. I have major heart.disease. heaven's sounding sweeter all the time Oz

REALLY

Definitions of the 2 different types of translations.

Jay, I believe in the God-breathed Scripture from th God who does not lie. The ministry of angels is beyond my rational understding. However, since God said what would happen in Matt 28:2, that is guaranteed by God. I'm in respite after 3 weeks in hospital. This world is not my home. Oz

1 John 5:7 is not known to be quoted before Sinaiticus. Do you know any early church fathers before Sinaiticus who quoted 1 John 5:7?

Compare Codex Sinaiticus with Textus Receptus & you'll what has been added or changed. Unless ypi read Greek, you'll need some tools to help you. Sinaiticus is faded in colour. That's why we need paleographers to read .& translatefor for us. Oz

0 Not true. That's exactly what Erasmus did in gathering Byzantine MSS from 12th century that contained ADDED text or variants when compared with Codex Sinaiticus. When Erasmus gathered his small number of MSS around 15th century to form Textus Receptus he could not ffind a Greek MSS...