Search results

Not a myth, just your misreading and misunderstanding of the texts. They are sons and daughters of Joseph, not Mary. Read more carefully.

True. Incorrect. Jesus was the only child born of Mary. The others were born to Joseph before his marriage to Mary. Numerous scriptures bear that out when studied carefully. Perpetual virginity is heresy and just plain stupid. Yet though she was to have relations with Joseph in her married...

No, she didn't.

Mary is dead, having no power at all. Ecc. 9:5-6,10.

About the space of half an hour: Rev 3:10: "Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth." Rev 17:12: "And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have...

Done here. You just keep spamming. You're not interested in responses.

What verses do you specifically refer to? I do not disgree that the Bible refers to, in a few places in the NT, positive "tradition". It just doesn't mean, in it's own context, what Roman Catholicism says it means, being apart from the predefined context.

Scripture came by God, even the Holy Ghost, 2 Tim. 3:16-17; 2 Pet. 1:19-21. You have a private interpretation of "tradition", that the Bible does not approve of.

I agree with those texts. Not in disagreement. Though I will disagree with how you "interpret" those texts, since I must agree with how God interpreted those texts. Yes, the church has authority, but not to take away from or add to God's written word. It's authority is in matters accepting...

Not sure what you mean by the question. Ask another way. We were speaking about interpretation, not reading. Two different things. I do not desire to have the two confused. No, of course not. We are not to "make our own doctrine (teaching), faith (beliefs) or churches (bodies apart from...

Bold claim of Roman Catholicism, but when examined, is found false. Peter, etal in Acts 2 were quoting scripture as final authority, like Joel, Psalms, David. You say you follow in the Apostles doctrine from Acts 2? Oh really??? Where is David (the person/being) right now according to Peter...

Non sequitur to OP. Not in disagreement. It is already agreed and given. To repeat is to waste space and time.

If you are just going to spam, and not speak with me, in reply to what I have stated and shared, I will leave you to your darkness.

Subject of the OP to start, why address others when you cannot admit that heresy first?

Strawman. Sola Scriptura does not mean that the Bible is the "only source of authority". That is a false construction of what Sola Scriptura means. It actually means that the Bible is the "final" authority in all matters of Faith and Practice. All authorities (Holy Ghost, angelic, men...

God alone. Genesis 40:8; 2 Peter 1:20; Luke 24:45; Isaiah 28:10,13; Daniel 2:18-30, etc. Not you. Not me. Not any 'pope'. God alone. Solus Deus. You have the same mindset as satan, who thinks that God needs assistance to interpret His own word. God already defined His word in the word.

See post 16 - Scripture challenge!

Yes, the apostles spoke (audible) that which was already written (visible): Luk 1:2: "Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word;" 1Pet 4:11: "If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do...

Yes, "updated" from 2+2=4, to 2+2=5. See the evil Jesuit semantics you play? You attempt 'positive' sounding words, but then insert your own definitions into those words to make them mean the complete opposite of or pervert what they etymologically mean. When you say "updated" it really means...

N Roman Catholic revisionist history. Both Jerome and Helvidius state that Jerome was altering the actual and original latin vulgate (aka the Italic or Vetus Latina that already existed). Jerome corrupted the Bible by order of the 'pope'. ". . . As early as about the turn of the fifth...