Search results

Sigh, as if there were no other texts on the subject, taking one text out of its context and not addressing everything else I have provided. You do realize by now that I address everything you present, and you addressed none of what I present? What does this say about your argumentation and...

Again, no. What they show is relationship of Son and Father. The texts do not say that Jesus is not Deity, but show that He is in nature Deity, and has a relationship to His Father, who is also in nature Deity. No, what you did, is what Muslims attempt to do (it is an error), and simply try to...

Again, no, it does not, and I gave specific examples, which you did not address. What you instead did, was bring up another text (Mark 14:62) in their ( Proof that Jesus is God ) place. On it's own, devoid of any other context, yes. By itself, devoid of context, would be an instance of the...

Actually, (JEHOVAH) it is! See these videos (Nehemia Gordon): Then go read John Gill's classic work on the subject, as well as Gail Riplinger's: John Gill - "A Dissertation Of The Hebrew Language" ( "... documents the use of the very name JEHOVAH from before 200 B.C. and throughout the...

I have told you, at least twice now, that I am not "trinitarian", and not to utilize a strawman of what I actually believe (eternal heavenly Trio) to speak with me. The KJB translators, being far advanced in translation that many are today (a list of their accomplishments and qualifications may...

Please read my questions again, as I never accused the Apostles of being 17th century anything, nor vice-versa: "Can you show me a single koine Greek mss in which the writers of the NT (Matthew - Revelation) used the phrase "JEHOVAH" as translated or even transliterated into koine Greek...

The so called Septuagint (LXX) doesn't actually exist. It's actually Sinaiticus (& Vaticanus) from Origen's Hexapla and was never 300 BC, but rather hundreds AD passing itself off based on a discredited myth (Letter of Aristeas). 'Taint no such thing as "the Septuagint". What you are actually...

All statements (Matthew 16:15-17; Acts 27:23) are correct and true, and neither do they negate the other texts, like John 1:1, and those which I already cited to you. It's like trying to point to texts which only mention 2-4 disciples (like James and John (Acts 12:2) or Peter, James and John...

That doesn't answer my questions, but simply sidesteps them. Another question: Were the writers of the NT inspired of the Holy Ghost in not using a koine Greek "IEOVAH" in their texts, even when citing OT in the NT? or were they inspired of the devil in not using it? Remember, you are...

Can you show me a single koine Greek mss in which the writers of the NT (Matthew - Revelation) used the phrase "JEHOVAH" as translated or even transliterated into koine Greek (IEOVAH, or something similar)? If not, why do you think that is? Why do you think that Matthew, Mark, Luke, John...

True. Incorrect. Simply because the first premise is true, does not give validity to the second. While, I (myself) or someone like John the Baptist can use the phrase "I am" (or even "εγω ειμι" in koine Greek, or something similar in Hebrew) it doesn't necessarily mean that I (or we) are...

Again, a false dichotomy, since again, both ("A." and "B.") are true, when understood in the light of scripture. I am not "trinitarian" (Roman Catholic definition), and would like therefore you to address what I actually say and believe, rather than a strawman of those things. I am not arguing...

Again, see my previous reply, since according to John 1, etal., the Person/Being of "θεος" (being "ο λογος") who was eternally "with" ("προς") "τον θεον" (being the Father). Therefore, according to John 1, 1 Corinthians 15:24 reveals that: 1Co 15:24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have...

It's actually a false dichotomy that you have presented. Though I am not "trinitarian" (Roman Catholic definition), I believe in the Heavenly eternal Trio, which is to say the "chord" of the Persons/Beings of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost/Spirit. Both "A." and "B." are true...

"only begotten" (μονογενη / monogene; John 3:16; 1 John 4:9, etc) doesn't mean created - ever. It simply means, 'the only one of the same genes/nature'. Time has nothing to do with the definition of the (compound, mono & gene) word, it is simply stating that which/what something is, not when...

Eze 28:14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Eze 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee...

No, that is incorrect. His first sin was "pride", being "lifted up" (Ezekiel 28:17) in heart, which led him to violence and defiling his heart temple: Job_41:34 He beholdeth all high things: he is a king over all the children of pride. Eze 28:12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the...

Yes, according to the scripture account, Cain and Abel were Adam and Eve's first offspring. Gen 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. Gen 4:2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain...

Malo, Seems a pretty basic choice, since neither the one [Christianity, thus Christian] or the other [Islam, thus Muslim or Muslima] are the same, neither interchangeable, or able to be confused one with another. It's like choosing between light [Christianity] and darkness [Islam]. That...

I see where you are going with the logic, and it seems at first to make sense, but there are several slight flaws therein (which I can show from scripture) that you may not yet see. However, since this thread is not about that topic specifically, I do not desire to continue to respond to that...