Search results

Scripture is clear that fiery destruction will accompany Jesus at His Second Coming, on that we can all agree. Should we, then, be surprised to read in Isaiah 66 this destruction will include the self-righteous, idolaters, and pork/mice/unclean meat eaters?

Thank you for stating the obvious: that heaven NEVER conforms to the whims of man, but that it is our duty to conform to the previously established dictates of heaven.

It's bulldookey reasoning like this that leads Preterists to conclude the fiery, Earth-shaking, cataclysmic Second Coming happened back in the first century Isaiah is clear Jesus is going to burn up pork eaters when He comes with fire.

What is so difficult for you guys to understand? Isaiah plainly says when the Lord comes with "fire" to punish "all flesh" when "the slain of the Lord shall be many" (which is exactly what Jeremiah says about it when "the slain of the Lord shall be at that day from one end of the Earth even to...

Isaiah 66:15-17 KJV plainly says Jesus is coming with fire to consume pork eaters, a truth that cannot be "spiritualized away" by other "proof texts". Is this not an apocalyptic description of the 2nd Advent? Why, yes. Which is why man ought to conform his ideas to it and not it to man's ideas...

The question, of course, is "who sets the precedent?" If heaven sets the precedent, the verse is simply a statement of assurance that heaven will approve of whatever is done if it's done according to precedent. If the papacy sets the precedent and heaven must conform to it, well that's about as...

According to Isaiah 66:15-17 KJV, when Jesus comes in fiery glory taking vengeance against rebellious mankind, He's going to burn up pork eaters and those who eat such abominable things. See, the "gospel prophet" Isaiah didn't only prophesy about the First Coming - he also prophesied of what...

We SDAs don't forbid meat - only unclean meat, as does Scripture. The PAPACY is guilty of forbidding CLEAN meat during papal festivals. Maggots are creatures, too. If you refuse a maggot sandwich, you're in trouble, right? Yes, the Word of God sanctifies only clean meat in Leviticus were you...

When proof is based on the unquestionable authority of Scripture, it doesn't matter what everyone and his dog says.

Not subjective in the least. Too often, that determination is based on whether it will have a positive or negative impact on one's comfort. In the past, Christians were willing to die rather than confess that round papal wafer was "the body of Christ"...today's Christians get offended and leave...

The TEXTUS RECEPTUS does! The Peshitta is the closest to the TR there is, and although there's a few variant readings, it's an astoundingly accurate MSS. The word "rest" in the first 8 verses of Hebrews 4 is "kataposis" which simply means "to cease" - HOWEVER, THE WORD "REST" IN VERSE NINE IS...

What if in 5 minutes I could show you PROOF - irrefutable, undeniable PROOF - that the Bible is true so that you'll no longer be able to remain an agnostic?

"Do we make void the (Old Covenant) through faith? God forbid. Yea, we establish the (Old Covenant)." - Romans 3:31 KJV, according to the Antinomian crowd.

I've never seen such legalistic nonsense by the OSAS crowd to get out of their obligation to stop doing that which made necessary the death of Jesus on the Cross in the first place. A son once asked his father for a car. The father bought him one and told him to always be careful. The son goes...

I've never seen such legalistic nonsense by the OSAS crowd to get out of their obligation to stop doing that which made necessary the death of Jesus on the Cross in the first place. A son once asked his father for a car. The father bought him one and told him to always be careful. The son goes...

In the OC, the people promised but couldn't deliver. In the NC, the same blessing and law apply, but with "better promises" provided by God: "Since you failed to keep your OC promise to obey, I'm going to make a NC where My promise to bless is the same, your promise to obey is the same but...

Yes, it was. What good are our beliefs if we're unwilling to allow them to stand the test of scrutiny?

The Unpardonable Sin is any sin from which we refuse to repent....like eating bacon, my friend. Jesus can't pardon our sins if we no longer feel the need to ask for pardon aka "the unpardonable sin" aka "blasphemy against the Holy Ghost".

Dude, don't you realize they're wondering why you can't answer my challenges? They want explanations from you.

Who wrote the Ten Commandments?