Search results

The context of Daniel 11:1-2, is in the context of Daniel 10:1, in the third year of Cyrus II the Great, and it was he who was then ruling during the time as the angel Gabriel was speaking to Daniel. Daniel's 10-12 is really one long chapter. Therefore: [0] Cyrus II the great (the then ruling...

I see your hatred of "JESUS" and for 'context'. It is clear. Thank you for your time.

The statement that I "REFUSED to answer", is simply untrue, and thus I distinctly cited Albert Barnes who addressed it, as others also did as even Keil and Kliefoth mention among their own peers in their own commentary (though they simply dismiss such), and I also gave you specific texts on it...

You cannot be serious? (though I think you are) Do you know how the mss are written in their original languages? However, even as a source which others referred to, Josephus, states: "... After the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, orthodox rabbinical tradition treated this event as the...

In fact, the whole idea of bodyless 'saints' in Heaven is spiritism. Heaven (3rd) is a tangible place that exists in the universe, for Christ Jesus, in glorified body of "flesh and bones" ascended to it, to the very "right hand" of His Father, and the real throne thereof. Secondly, why would...

What is funny is that you ellipsed the remainder of what I stated about the great red dragon from scripture, and ignored the study provided, not addressing it at all.

No, its the same sources, as both Gershon and Yisrael have direct ties to each other - How The 6 Day War Birthed The Temple Mount Movement Their material, is simply website propaganda, based upon an 'angelic' experience. Call the Antiquities office, call the political offices in Jerusalem...

Already addressed at the beginning, and nothing has been seen which shows it to be in error: Dan 9:26 KJB - And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end...

I disagree, but if you do not any longer desire to participate herein, that is of course up to you. I would rather have discussed with you, rather than the others. Yes, indeed. Thank you for replying about it. Did you fully read both, or no? Just asking. Why do you say it is an 'unscriptural...

You just took what I said out of context. The statement about "historically", refers to over a period of time, from earliest to latter, that agreement existed about the 'years' on the whole, "Even historically, we can go to the so called 'ECF' and see a general agreement of 'years':"

You haven't read what I stated about this, obviously. Go back and read through please. "the going forth of" "the commandment" is from God, through 3 men: Dan 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and...

Even historically, we can go to the so called 'ECF' and see a general agreement of 'years': 200AD Hippolytus of Rome (70 weeks): "16. That transgressions, therefore, are blotted out, and that reconciliation is made for sins, is shown by this. But who are they who have reconciliation made for...

You keep citing Walvoord, already addressed - The Catholic Origins of Futurism and Preterism

The statement is patently false. See, for a good many (and others besides those which I also have all agree - Daniel 9:24 -

It's why my position doesn't rely upon commentary, but the text and history itself.

No, what I basically said was that their 'find' refuted themselves.

You are confused, as I already addressed Keil, etc. Brown's Drivers and Briggs Lexicon, "... Properly passive participle of H7650 as a denominative of H7651; [exactly as TWOT says] literally sevened, that is, a week (specifically of years):—seven, week. ..." - Strong's Number 7620 Hebrew...

You do realize that neither "jot" (ιωτα' G2503) nor "tittle" (κεραια; G2762)(Matthew 5:18) are the diacritics? A "jot" (ιωτα) is a whole Letter, such as the smallest Greek letter 'iota' (ί; 9th letter), and also to the Hebrew "letter" (not a diacritic), being the tenth letter of the Hebrew...

Again, your opinion. You sure like to cite "you" alot as authority.

Have you considered Matthew 18:22 as translated into Hebrew, "שבעים ושבע"; "שִׁבְעִים וָשֶׁבַע"(Salkinson-Ginsburg; Dalman-Delitzsch)? Which matches Daniel 9:24, "שָׁבֻעִים שִׁבְעִים"? Just as I stated they paralleled? What about Genesis 4:24, "שִׁבְעִים וְשִׁבְעָה"? Do you understand the...