Search results

Losing a few jewels in a crown is not a consequence. Losing joy for a little while is not a consequence. Missing out on a few blessings in life is not a consequence. These are what you OSAS License to Sin teachers present as "consequences"? Give me a break!

Sorry, you didn't answer....because you know there isn't one.

Your OSAS License to Sin will not deliver anyone in the Judgment.

People can't refuse to take the test and then tell Jesus "I didn't know" when they hear Him say "depart" - take the test!!!

While everyone can have different opinions, we can't have our own truth, especially since we're told the last days will be swirling with deception, so much so that even we who konw the truth need to be on our guard.

Yes, you are concerned or you wouldn't have asked. Jesus kept the commandments perfectly and they accused Him of being a fraud...did He argue with them or did He point them to the Scriptures and allow them to speak in His defense?

You didn't answer my question: How can there still be 7 more years of tribulation after Jesus comes as a thief to collect the saints in a "secret rapture" if the Earth won't sustain life for 7 more minutes when He comes?

Hello...Proverbs 4:18 KJV calls it the "Path of the Just" for a reason! It's a trail blazed by the glory of the Cross and tread by those who "should walk even as He walked". You're not gonna make it to "that perfect day" of redemption if you remain fallen in the Left Ditch of License to Sin...

Can't pass the test? Study harder!

Only an immature, irresponsible child desires to escape right consequences for wrong choices, and that's exactly what the OSAS License to Sin does: allows the Licensed to escape the same punishment for doing the exact same things for which the Unlicensed will be punished. Your childlike reaction...

See, you read "Abide in Me" as optional, while the true Christian reads it as a choice we must make lest we fail to bear fruit, wither, and burn in the Fire. Pretty sure "dead faith" is the kind you promote, friend - absent of works. James says living faith is shown by our works. OSAS claims...

Ah, so if two friends die while horrifically raping an innocent girl, one grace-saved but backslidden and the other not saved, the grace saved one goes to heaven while the other goes to hell. A blind man can see that turns "grace" into "license" - the OSAS License to Sin.

Yes, the "heavenly" point of prohibitions against eating unclean meats is that they cloud the mind, inhibit spiritual discernment, cause physical harm and thus psychological harm in that we become vulnerable to fiery darts of Satan, etc. As you can see, I'm not missing anything - I know full...

I did address it, saying it's unreasonable to demand the verse refers to a specific ritual instead of a series of different idolatrous behaviors engaged separately at any given time. I also pointed out Isaiah didn't mention lambchops or any other clean meat: he mentioned pork. Dual prophecies...

Don't concern yourself with WHAT OTHERS DO - concern yourself with what YOU ARE DOING. James says we're to look in the mirror of the law and see if we're abiding by it.

Altogether now, repeat after me: "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, EXCEPT JOHN 21:18-19 KJV, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness..."

Well said!

Let's focus on the problem: the proper translation of "koinos". If the KJV translators had correctly chosen "common", no problem. But since they chose "unclean", we do have a problem: is pork now OK? Let's examine the evidence: 1) no record of anyone eating anything unclean in the NT 2) Jesus...

Is that why He gave us marriage - to teach us that "love" eclipses all infidelity, neglect, even physical and emotional spousal abuse? Can't understand how it is that the same "Christians" who divorce a cheating spouse and remarry before the ink has a chance to dry insist a "relationship" with...

We've got to remember that Catholicism had century after century to confuse the minds of the people so that even during the Reformation certain translations of words were chosen as to what seemed best at the time. For instance, Hebrews 4:9 KJV plainly says "SABBATISMOS" which even a blind man...