Search results

Strong's H3498: יָתַר yâthar, yaw-thar'; a primitive root; to jut over or exceed; by implication, to excel; (intransitively) to remain or be left; causatively to leave, cause to abound, preserve:—excel, leave (a remnant), left behind, too much, make plenteous, preserve, (be, let) remain(-der...

LOL, really, I'm not offended. If Christians can't discuss hot button issues without becoming indignant, then we have more to be concerned with about our faith than who the Antichrist is or whether a pre-trib rapture will spare us from the Mark.

Here is where: Hebrews 8:5 - "...as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, [that] thou make all things according to the pattern showed to thee in the mount." Hebrews 9:23 - "[It was] therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the...

I don't prejudge. I evaluate the spiritual propositions that I hear to see if they stand the test of Biblical scrutiny. So, just call them the "Ten Suggestions" then, because that's exactly what you think they are, right? What, that Christians are obligated to keep the Ten Commandments...

I misunderstand that Jesus said He didn't lose anyone "except the son of perdition"? Sounds like He lost someone that was previously not lost, and I'm sure Judas had noble intentions at first and wanted to follow Jesus, but his carnal nature got the best of him.

He certainly wasn't performing miracles by the power of Satan alongside of them that had the Holy Spirit, right? Jesus said He didn't lose anyone "except" the one He lost: Judas. That means he was at one time not lost, right?

Antiochus the Chump could never in a million years be considered to be greater than Alex the Great. The antecedant of the masculine pronoun "them" in "out of one of them came forth a little horn" cannot be the noun "horns" because "horns" is feminine - while "winds" is used as a masculine noun...

Oh, trust me, you ain't hurtin my feelings, but I think it's you who needs to understand that facts don't care about feelings :)

I agree, but it also speaks of the 70 Weeks being "determined" ("cut off") from the larger prophecy of the 2,300 Days, does it not? The scant decrees of Cyrus and Darius cannot compare to the comprehensive decree of Artaxerxes which makes it the only one that fits Gabriel's description of it...

You fail to understand that in John 17 JESUS HIMSELF says the only one He lost was Judas, which implies Judas had previously been been safely kept, just like the father of the Prodigal said "my son was lost" which means he'd previously been safely kept. Judas was casting out demons and healing...

As long as the association we make of the only two "sons of perdition" - Judas and Man of Sin - leads us to correctly conclude that the Man of Sin is the papacy, we've correctly identified the man of sin

he's not the Little horn - which Daniel says was "exceeding great" beyond the "great" ram and the "very great" he goat. Antiochus Epiphenes IV was a pathetic little dweeb who was derogatorily known as "Epemenes" (mad man), was a prisoner and hostage for a time, and he and his entire army were...

There you go with the shouting again...:rolleyes: The "Man of Sin" Antichrist is called "the son of perdition" because like Judas, it started out as good, arose within the church to leadership, became seduced by lust for money and power, committed apostasy and turned against Jesus and His truth...

The claim that the Little Horn was fulfilled in Daniel is just so entirely asinine I'm not going to waste my time. The Little Horn of Daniel was NOT Antiochus Epiphenes IV by several irrefutably arguments. The Judgement scene in Daniel 7 and the fire that the Little Horn is to be cast in...

I counted five (!) in five sentences of your post #222. One or two would be emphasis. Five in five is clearly shouting. Those who get wrapped up in emotionalism demonstrate how weak their arguments are - just like liberal snowflakes who shout down their opposition because they know they can't...

Jesus had to rebuke Peter as "Satan" did he not? Let's not be so naive as to pretend that Satan hasn't infiltrated, seated himself, and operates behind evil or misguided, well meaning men who wear a garb of Christianity. Absolutely false. Daniel's prophecy refers to the anointing of Jesus...

No need to shout. We're all here to "reason together". The facts are that Jesuit Futurism is a lie and can be shown to be such. The great apostasy Paul spoke of was expected by Bible writers to come upon the church soon after they were gone. Paul: "I know after my departing, grievous wolves...

Paul was a crusader against the keeping of the Law of Moses, but i'm sure you'll agree was a firm advocate for the keeping of the Ten Commandments, including the Sabbath, as evidenced by the "writer to the Hebrews" (obviously Paul) in Hebrews 4:9-10. Although he makes constant use of the Greek...

Have you ever heard of the Dark Ages? A time when between 50 - 150 Christians were killed BY ORDER OF THE CHURCH? You're preaching Jesuit Futurism. Protestant Historicism is the correct interpretation of eschatology, and shows how the "falling away" happened right on time and the "man of sin"...

Short video of gay man claiming he and Leftist hero Obama did cocaine/homosexual activity together What do you think?