Search results

My wife told me to place you on Ignore when I really didn't want to do so, and I took her advice...but later thought better of it and did what I wanted to do.

Somehow I knew that you would continue to take on the nature and employment of the accuser of the brethren in this also. You have to know that there is an ignore button on the computer and that I did indeed press that button; so I also did not lie in this. You are going to GET IT on the day of...

(took you off of ignore) You seem to think that I am here to lie about the Catholic Church....when the reality is that I do not even make it my primary ministry to minister to Catholics. If I did, you can be certain that I would make myself more informed and would be saying things that you...

There is definitely a desensitization going on; so that when the mark arrives most people may not even notice the difference.

Hebrews 7:12 shows clearly that with a change in priesthood there would come also a change in law (for our Lord sprang out of Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood. And therefore, Jesus, in order for Him to be High Priest, as He is High Priest, must be High Priest...

The 4th commandment (the sabbath?) is fulfilled in Jesus Christ (see Matthew 11:28- 30) Mat 11:28, Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Mat 11:29, Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto...

I will answer this when you have answered my question.

@mjrhealth, Am I correct in believing that it is your contention that we ought not to look to the Bible for the truth of the Lord?

Actually, the words are, "If we say that we have no sin" which is referring to indwelling sin rather than practical sins....otherwise 1 John 1:8 is in contradiction to 1 John 3:5-9. In that, I obtain the Holy Ghost through faith (Galatians 3:14), the love of God is shed abroad in my heart...

In that it did not have the power to impart life (Galatians 3:21). In that it was weak and unprofitable and made nothing perfect (Hebrews 7:18-19).

(peeked in to find this) : It is clear to everyone that you are the liar in this dispute...as well as the accuser of Jesus Christ Himself. (for all of my sins are under the blood; and therefore Jesus took the penalty for anything that I did that was truly wrong. And therefore, if you want...

(peeked in to find this) : Still, not an out-and-out lie. You need to repent of accusing me of lying in that instance. "Perhaps" means "it may or may not be." There is no possibility that Adolph Hitler was the first President; he did not live in the same time-frame. That Diotrephes may have...

Oh...Oh...put me on Ignore too. Because I really do agree with the premise of being "Blood Bought"

Am I correct in believing that it is your contention that we ought not to look to the Bible for the truth of the Lord?

You wear me thin. 2 Timothy 4:2 is commanded to all who read it. And now, you say that the Bible doesn't contain the gospel. He commands us to preach the word. That is the Bible.

Obviously He is saying that the former covenant was inferior in some way.

Wow, didn't see that before. He found fault with Israel, didn't He?

I believe that as born again Christians, we rely on the Holy Spirit to pinpoint our sins to us. And He often uses the law to do this. But once our sins are confessed, there is no use in focusing on that sin and the fact that the law defines it as a sin. That sin is under the blood. The law...

I don't see what you are talking about.

The first covenant, Hebrews 8:7.