Search results

It is really just so simple, that God the Father incarnated to become a Man, Eph 3:11, According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord: Because He lives one eternal moment (see 2 Peter 3:8) and then descends to be incarnated as the Son. And, that when Jesus died on...

I have made my interpretation public; and therefore it is no longer private. It is also faithful. But I think that you are simply not understanding what I am saying about it. If I were you therefore, I would pray for understanding and go back and read what I have posted to you.

In context of what I am saying, salvation is the imparting of spiritual, everlasting life. A temporary redemption is no redemption at all. There is no going to heaven with a temporary redemption. And when I understand that I am redeemed, I understand this to mean that I am going to heaven.

It's actually the star of your god Remphan, Acts of the Apostles 7:43.

The Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ are the same Spirit, Ephesians 4:4.

"sharing" says to me that sometimes God the Father has the divine nature and other times Jesus has the divine nature. Because I see it like children sharing a toy. There isn't going to be a situation in that scenario where both children are always touching that toy. They will have to take...

God is not divided in my book. Time and eternity has everything to do with it.

Why would God send a message of salvation that is commonly misunderstood by the common reader? Does the Lord specifically not want people to understand His salvation message?

It seems to me like the gospel headed west rather than east from its conception. So you're saying that God deliberately sent the gospel to an area where His word would not be understood correctly when taken at face value according to the thinking of those to whom that word was sent. I'm not...

I would say that this rendering is not in accordance with sound doctrine; and that therefore you are involving yourself in strifes of words. 1Ti 6:4, He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 2Ti 2:14...

Yes, I would like to hear about this. So, you are saying that there is miscommunication to the common reader when we read the Bible today?

I'm sorry that you simply cannot see what I am trying to explain, @101G. I don't know if it has to do with 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 or if your brain is simply less intelligent than mine. I think that if you ask the Holy Spirit to help you to understand what I am saying, He will reveal it to you...

All of Him stayed behind. I don't think you are understanding the nature of infinite vs. finite and eternal vs. temporal. Try to think about how anything that is infinite and eternal can cease to be infinite and eternal; even if the same did condescend to become one of us. He dwelleth in...

Why then did the apostle John include himself in those who are not without sin in 1 John 1:8, by using the word "we"?

Okay...a church of about ten before the actual filling on the day of Pentecost. There is no reason to argue...for it is clear that the church would receive power when the Holy Ghost would come upon them (Acts of the Apostles 1:8)...and that definitely happened on the day of Pentecost. Perhaps...

I've already given you the explanation, weren't you paying attention? If anyone dwells in eternity, they are eternally there in eternity; and even if they were to descend out of eternity to become finite, they would not cease to dwell in eternity. For that is the nature of eternity. So then...

Hi @101G, I do believe that Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, are absolutely ONE, so that the Father is the Son is the Holy Ghost. However, I also see distinctions in their attributes, such as: 1) The Father is distinct from the Son in that He is an eternal, infinite Spirit (John 4:23-24) who...

A. see Ephesians 3:11. God lived one eternal moment (see 2 Peter 3:8) and then descended to incarnate as the Son.

That doesn't necessarily follow. It could have been empowered the day that it became an actual body. But a point that can be made in your favour is that if the church consists of those who have the Holy Spirit, there was indeed a church consisting of about two or three disciples the day that...

What's the big deal about whether it is identified as Roman or not?