Search results

Again, all you have done is provide additional REPETITIVE sources for the identical claim. There is no dispute that CATHOLICS have always practiced baptismal regeneration but MY point is that "church" and its daughters are heretical and therefore NOT the church of the Living God. You are never...

That question is dishonest. You already know the context and it is eternal torment for ALL who are in the LOF.

I reject your source, therefore your "proof". Catholics are heretics when it comes to baptismal regeneration ( among other heresies like transsubstantiation). Try again my friend.

You are going to have to prove that statement about "the early church" and being "born again" since the phrase is never used in Acts which is the history of the Church. And Peter himself says being "born again" is by the word of God. No water. 1 Peter 1:23

As a matter of fact: there have been approximately 450 English translations, either in whole or in part, since the AV1611, but whose counting? The statement I made which you quoted was in reply to that person who listed 17 English versions of one verse. I would have to scroll back to get the...

Since "somebody" dishonestly thinks my post accuses God of sin, I will not continue to speak to that "somebody". And here I thought we could have a respectful conversation.

Incorrect. BRB: it's supper time.

Supper time! "I'll be back".

Galatians 3:1....is against the Judaizers who taught the same doctrine as this poster is attempting to preach. Oh foolish Galatians, who hath BEWITCHED YOU (emphasis mine). This passage teaches that returning to Judaism is witchcraft. If it were me, I would warn others NOT to follow the OP.

17 various translations = confusion = corruption of Doctrine.

FYI: Abraham was a Hebrew. Get that wrong and one's entire Theology crumbles.

It has been my experience that when people get obsessed with "correcting" Scripture they always end up looking the fool.

You stole my thunder. I was going to say this is a non-issue that is more flesh than Spirit of God. We should be less concerned with this nonsense and more concerned with reaching the lost with the Gospel.

Thanks for your informative reply. I know what Ted Talks are. I've listened to a few. I just never heard of it compared to a style of preaching. Makes sense though. IMO: if it ain't Expository preachin', it ain't right!! Take that two edged sword and do some dividing!!

I will never be able to go, so thanks for the "mental" tour.

I am not playing your game. I've watched this thread close enough to know what you believe, and I am in no mood.

I have three in my bucket list. Not in this order: 1. New Zealand (for trout fishing) 2. Scotland (to see my ancestors' home) 3. Thailand (for its culture and unique mountains). Even though my home state, (Idaho) has its own world class trout fishing, I would love to visit New Zealand for...

IMHO: Since there is no difference between Theology and Bible Study, there should be only one. Theology = study of God by definition. Bible = God's revelation of Himself. Therefore when studying the Bible, you ARE studying God which by definition is Theology. See? It is circular because there...

I need not explain my "bias" at all. Everything you are saying both prophetically and doctrinally is antithetical to established Scripture and orthodox Christian doctrine.

No. I meant exactly what I said in the manner in which I said it. You are claiming special revelation. This is no different than Smith or White.