Search results

Post 16 is speaking of the "last" day of the 1000 yr. long DoL found in Rev.20:9, imo.

What prophesies describe is simply day one w/ many more to follow. It seems like you took a bunch of scriptures about different things nd try to make them into one, it doesn't work. None of your scrips are about the DOL: Isaiah 9:14 (not the DoL), Isaiah 29:5-8 (fulfilled in 70ad), Zechariah 3:9...

The DOL is over a thousand yrs. long, it is "not" one day and ends "after" the millennium. Matt. 24:29-31 is the rapture/resurrection "not" the physical second coming, imo.

I tend to read Rev. as generally occurring chronologically and metaphors can be used to describe different things. Because of unbelief and the unsaved believing the lie "both" the rapture/resurrection and Armageddon will take the unbelieving and unrepentant world by surprise.

Imo, the Dol starts w/ the opening of the 6th seal which is before the end of the week but nothing in scripture associates it w/ the GT.

None of that is actually said in scripture, that is opinion only.

The main problem w/ this is that the GT is "not" the last 3 1/2 yrs. of the 70th week nor is it wrath upon the world and you won't find a scripture that says it is. The GT is upon the church and will start towards the beginning of the 70th week before the 5th seal.

Your words: "Everything the prophets see in visions of God is prophecy of God, unless it does not come to pass, then it is false prophecy not of God." You are making declarative statements about God that aren't true. You aren't allowing for the fact that God can change his mind or that there are...

Just saying, there are many prophecies that have already been fulfilled.

I disagree w/ your heavens breakdown I think they are simply the sky, outer space, and then an invisible spiritual heaven that is not in a black hole it's just a different realm from the physical we live in. That whole church as the bride scenario isn't in scripture, it's a made up scenario by...

Your last sentence, "So their not being aware of it proves that they would not see Him physically in His Second Advent, which therefore must be invisible to physical sight." I don't believe this is a viable conclusion. Lack of belief doesn't make one unaware of a truth, it would be more like not...

Does anything in Ez. 40+ actually say it's a prophecy? Is it a false prophecy if it's not talking about the millennium? While Ezekiel is indeed a prophet not everything in his book is a prophecy and that is the same w/ all of them. Perhaps it's not a false prophecy but a false understanding of...

Ez. 40+ isn't as much of a prophecy as it is a conditional promise for the generation alive at that time. When Israel fulfills the conditions, many of the promises will be kept, but it will be for a generation that is no longer under the law, so some of it will change, just as our position...

Animal sacrifices were "never" offered as an act of praise! They only had one purpose and that was for the temporary atonement for sins of the individual or the nation of Israel because w/o the shedding of blood there was no remission of sin. Why haven't christians been doing so for the past...

There is absolutely no reason to do so, it would be an incredible waste of time and life. The animals in the millennium will be more Eden-like, lion laying down w/ the lamb, etc. I already explained the deal about Ezekiel, if you want to continue to believe a fallacy, that's up to you.

Again that's not saying what you think it is. If you really believe animal sacrifices will return then you're bordering on blasphemy by believing that. Paul is saying that Christ has become our place of sacrifice (altar), He is the "one bread". This verse is the key, ".Behold Israel after the...

I thought so, this isn't saying what you think it is. Historically and until 70 ad the temple was the "jobsite" for the Levites, their "pay" was a portion of the offerings/sacrifices with which to feed them and their families. That tradition extends to the preachers of the gospel (now that...

Location please because I suspect you're not understanding things correctly. Paul would never say that and Jesus would never condone that.

I believe "most" of Zech. 14 is post mill. It doesn't say or imply that he is arriving, simply that he is standing there helping his people get to safety. He won't stand on the earth until "after" Armageddon. I believe Armageddon to be history hear and is what is spoken of in vss. 1-2 but then I...