Search results

Jesus had already raised the Temple of his body long before the Physical temple was destroyed. I doubt very much the Disciples saw any fulfillment of Matt 24 when Jesus was actually raised from the dead. They were to flee the city before the impending destruction of the temple in Matt 24, yet...

24 “Seventy weeks [of years, or 490 years] have been decreed for your people and for your holy city (Jerusalem), to finish the transgression, to make an end of sins, to make atonement (reconciliation) for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness (right-standing with God), to seal up...

70 weeks of days From the going forth of the decree 457BC + 69 weeks (483 days)) to the Messiah = 455 BC.? No cross work. 70 weeks of years 457BC + 69 weeks (483 years) to the Messiah = 26AD , Bingo. Cross work, see below. 24 “Seventy weeks [of years, or 490 years] have been decreed for your...

Jesus was cut off, shed his blood and rose from the dead and in doing so atoned for sin, and established everlasting righteous in him etc. etc. How can he possibly be cut off in the future?

I agree. Jn 17 4 I have glorified You [down here] on the earth by completing the work that You gave Me to do. 5 Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory and majesty that I had with You before the world existed.

If one is fulfilled, then they all are. All in 70 weeks.

This is ridiculous. You should know if you would say such a thing, so who is playing games. I am done trying to discuss this with you.

Do you deny saying it? ANSWER IT AND THEN WE CAN MOVE ON

Why not just tell us how you interpret the destruction of the temple instead of avoiding. Somebody said it. If it wasn't you, I apologize

What did you write?

So you deny saying it? I am not going to go look for it. Hopefully someone else remembers this and can chime in. Which post?

You have a short memory. I told you that the OC ended at the cross and God had left the building a page or 2 back. You were saying the OC passed in 70AD remember? Glad you have changed your mind. What conclusion are you coming to now regarding the temple being destroyed in Matt 24, Luke 21 ? Can...

He may know that if he answers the question regarding when God warned The Jews of the coming destruction with NT scripture, it will totally destroy his argument. Selah

hmmx1:

Sorry double post

By assumption, I was referring to Which discourse you meant. You assumed that I would know what you were referring to LOL I have already tried to do that LOL It's based on Jesus's warning of what would LITERALLY befall the city and temple. That = 70AD. Like the Prophets before him they spoke...

What lengthy explanation are you talking about? You assume a lot. Besides, you didn't answer my question. How did God warn the people of Jesus day of the impending doom of AD70? Ans... God warned them personally through Jesus Christ in the scriptures already provided in this thread. God raised...

Do you agree that God never brings judgement without first warning that particular generation to repent? Amos 3:7 Surely the Lord God does nothing Without revealing His secret plan [of the judgment to come] To His servants the prophets. How did God warn the people of Jesus day of the impending...

I don't believe I am. He spoke of both, as I have already pointed out. Yes indeed I pointed that out as well. I believe I mentioned this as well lol I have already addressed this. Of course Again, I agree completely It should be clear to you now that I am not missing Spiritual...

Its not a nonsense that the second temple was destroyed. Its not a nonsense that the vail was torn and God had left the building in the past. What do you think was going to happen to land, building and temple now God was not there to protect it? Jesus himself tells us PLAINLY what would happen...