Search results

WRONG. The Church has ALWAYS used the term, “Anathema” as a temporary condition. There is NO Catholic teaching which holds that the Church can condemn a person’s soul to Hell – and there NEVER has been. We'vw ALWAYS believed that this power is reserved for GOD alone . . . You vomit out these...

Seriously?? What an asinine argument. For all intents and purposes, an adoptive or foster parent is a parent. Another moronic argument . . . Peter was Mark’s father in Jesus Christ. To ALL of the Church in Corinth, Paul said: For I became your FATHER in Christ Jesus through the gospel" (1...

Acts 2:38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. Notice it doesn’t say: Acts 2:38 “Repent and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. And THEN be baptized.”...

Immersion IS dunking. – and vice versa. You stuck your foot in your mouth . . .

Where’s your proof for that moronic statement? There’s not one shred of evidence that Peter had children. He may have – but there is NO evidence. Peter was absolutely in Rome and was crucified there upside-down. This is attested to by Clement of Rome (Letter to the Corinthians, written c. AD...

The Bible tells us that Jesus returns ONCE - not twice. YOU have YET to show me any documented evidence of this “secret return” that you speak of. Jesus Himself labels YOU as a false prophet (Matt. 24:23). Ummm, although the word “Trinity” is not in Scripture - the Bible has PLENTY to say...

He was the foster-father of Jesus. GOD was His Father. My “mistakes”?? I’ve given you the literal and cultural definitions and uses of “Adelphos” from scholarly and Biblical sources. I’ve also provided several Biblical examples. There’s been NO mistake on MY part . . .

Precisely. Baptism for the forgiveness of sins and inparture of the Holy Spirit was a NEW experience for the NT age that was foretold in the OT by Ezekiel. And yes – it DOES mirror the way Peter describes the effects of Baptism in Acts 2:38-39. For your information, the Diaspora started over...

I’m sorry that you are so gullible as to be taken in by a single false teacher. Here’s a little advice: If something sounds wacky, chances are that is IS - and you should look for corroborating evidence . . .

And I’ve already proven that to be a falsehood. The Letters of a FIRST century Catholic Bishop named Ignatius of Antioch describes the Early Church as being unashamedly Catholic: - They believed in a hierarchy of Bishops, priests and deacons. - They believed in and worshipped the Eucharist as...

And thou doesn’t understand that Jesus wasn’t talking about Passover in John 3. Like I said – you’ll pervert God’s Word just to disagree.

He wasn’t Joseph’s child. Joseph was His foster-father. GOD was His Father. READ your Bible . . . It’s not me. I just take the advice of Scripture . . . Matt. 7:18-20 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down...

That’s why I consult the knowledge of Greek and Hebrew linguistic scholars., who know infinitely more than YOU . . . Answer: She didn’t have any other children. Jesus was an ONLY child. If she had other sons – THEY would have taken her into their care after Jesus died – and NOT the Apostle...

Exekiel’s prophecy perfectly describes what Baptism DOES to the person – the forgiveness of sins and the renewal of the Spirit. It’s Ir mirrors the way Peter describes the effects of Baptism in Acts 2:38-39. You don’t care because it proves you WRONG . . . Just like ANY other historical record...

No - Scripture mzkrd iy crystal-clear they they weren't uterine sublings. I challenge you to prove me wrong . . .

Nonsense. Some Jewish sects, like those of the Kabbalah believe in reincarnation – multiple “rebirths” is not a tenet of Judaism. Nicodemus was a faithful Jew who was puzzled at the very idea of “rebirth”. And I already educated you about WHY your theory doesn’t work/ If by “Water”, Jesus was...

The difference is that Baptists – and ALL non-Catholic sects were invented by MEN during and after the 16th century. The Catholic church goes back to Jesus and the Apostles . . . And YOUR mistake is going to AI for your theology. The Catholic Church isn’t broken up into multiple pieces Again...

And I'm tire of faithless anti-Christians who proliferate the falsehood that God has limits . . .

But the Hebrew and Greek ansolutely DO . . .

Matt. 27:56 says, "…among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee". Mark 15:40 states, "There were also women looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and...