Search results

Another DODGE . . . I never addressed the Rock. I never addressed Peter's confession. I simply exposed your heretical aboniation that Christ's Church was "Destroyed" at some oint. WHEN are YOU and @Aunty Jane gong to address this and repent of it?

And NONE of this addresses the heretical statement YOU and @ Behold agreed upon. Will either of you repent of this abomination - or just continue to deflect? STILL trying to dodgr the fact that you guys said that Jesus’s Church was “Destroyed” – even though HE said that would NEVER happen...

You're BOTH voming out the sae old manure. The fact is that neither of you wants to own up to is that you BOTH inferred that Jesus is a LIAR by stating that His Church was "destroyed" at some point. Two peoppl from different faith traditons puking up the SAME heresy . . .

And there you go again - repeating your heresy . . . Read carefully, son: "... I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." According to YOU - Jesus is a LIAR. Good luck with that on the Day of Judgement . . .

Nice rant . . . And not a SINGLE word of your diatribe will erase the fact that both YOU and @Behold said that Catholic Church “Destroyed” Christianity. I never brought up the Catholic Church. YOU did .. .

Very interesting that you jump on something that I WASN’T arguing. I never mentioned the Peter/Rock debate. I simply quoted the Word of God to show you and your other anti-Jesus friend that you BOTH are inferring that He is a LIAR for saying that His Church was “destroyed”. You BOTH have a lot...

Birds of a feather share the SAME heresies. Christ's Church CAN'T be destroyed. You both may think that Jesus is a LIAR - but we Catholics don't: Matt. 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

NO - you didn't. I'll just chalk this up to your usual cowardice. You don't WANT to answer because you have NO answer. Next time, just tell me up front that you don't understand the verses. That way, I won't waste time trying to get an answer . . .

continued . . . They could have been cousins, relatives, kinsmen, etc. Relatives of ANY kind are also “Adelphoi” And I never even implied that they were anything but relatives. WRONG. I’ve already given you multiple verses from the Septuagint that use “Adelphos” in places for “Cousins” and...

Then WHY do you keep whining and vomiting out blatant LIES, like the following from post #3514: “But as the times of Jesus did not rely on AI, adelphos was ALWAYS familial brethren genetically. “ NOT according to what YOU said above No – pit was a unanimous belief among the Rebels...

Then WHY do you keep whining and vomiting out blatant LIES, like the following from post #3514: “But as the times of Jesus did not rely on AI, adelphos was ALWAYS familial brethren genetically. “ NOT according to what YOU said above . . .

This is yet another dodge . . . Why are you so afraid to give me your interpretation of these verses?? I only referred to your “cowardly denials” because that’s all you’re willing to present. When somebody asks you for an explanation for what you believe – you should be ready and willing to...

No - it's more like arrested development. No - just a rejection of stupidity . . . Most of your posts are nothig more than ignorant anti-Cathollic rants. Besides - how can YOU help when you're more lost and confused than 90% of the posters on this forum?

Then YOU need to write in a manner that is not polluted with third-rate, quasi-poetic language If this is the way you communicate in-person – you probably don’t have many friends. At least none that will listen to you or take you seriously . . . As for “rage” – there was NONE in my post.

WRONG again. Rev. 11:19 makes NO sense without Rev. 12:1. v. 19 introduces the subject of v. 1. No – you just gave me the usual cowardly denials with ZERO evidence. Anyway - I never mentioned the New Eve or Queen of Heaven. That’s just more diversion and deflection on YOUR part . . . You...

DEAD WRONG, as usual. As I educated you earlier – the word “Adelphos” and all its variants is used 344 times in the NT. 41 times (12%) are cases where "Adelphos" clearly or probably refers to a family sibling. 47 instances (14%) are cases where "Adelphos" may or may not refer to a family...

In other words you can’t tell me what Paul is saying in Rom. 11:22 - can you? What does he mean by, “… you too will be CUT OFF”?? Read the verse s-l-o-w-l-y and see that Paul is comparing the fallen with those formerly secure but have ALSO fallen. And don’t think I didn’t notice that you...

That’ only HALF of the story . . . Paul is comparing the fallen with those formerly secure but have ALSO fallen. He is writing to believing Christians and that’s why he says: “… but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise “YOU TOO will be CUT OFF.” Explain what...

Rev. 11:19 begins a narrative about what is being talked about in Rev. 12. YOU would have us believe that it is simply a random statement. Rev. 11:19; 12:1 Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant was seen within his temple. There were flashes of lightning, rumblings...

LYING?? Here is a snapshot of what Google AI says about the word, “Adelphos”: People who LOSE an argument ALWAYS accuse their victorious opponent of "lying" . . . Ummmm, I ALSO defeated you using BibleStudyTools.com and Strong’s Greek Lexion. All YOU’VE given me are worthless denials – as...